Wide variation in effectiveness of laboratory disinfectants against bacteriophages

D. E. Halfhide, B. W. Gannon, C. M. Hayes, J. M. Roe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study was to identify an effective disinfectant for the inactivation of the bacteriophages (phages) being used in our laboratory, as published studies on phage inactivation are far from unanimous in their conclusions. Methods and Results: The phages studied were three closely related strains of Myoviridae and three strains of Siphoviridae. Three disinfectants which are used commonly in microbiology laboratories were evaluated: Virkon (1%), ethanol (75%) and sodium hypochlorite (2500 ppm available chlorine). The most effective of these was Virkon, which inactivated all six phages rapidly. Ethanol was effective against the Myoviridae but had little effect on the Siphoviridae. Sodium hypochlorite was the least effective of the disinfectants evaluated. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate a wide diversity in the effectiveness of disinfectants tested for inactivation of phages. Significance and Impact of the Study: Of the disinfectants tested Virkon is the most suitable choice for those unable to carry out disinfection validation studies, or where a broad spectrum disinfectant against phages is required. All of the phages in this study showed resilience to inactivation by sodium hypochlorite, and therefore this disinfectant is an unwise choice for use against phage without first assessing its effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-612
Number of pages5
JournalLetters in Applied Microbiology
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bacteriophage
  • Disinfection
  • Ethanol
  • Hypochlorite
  • Inactivation
  • Phage
  • Virkon
  • Virus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wide variation in effectiveness of laboratory disinfectants against bacteriophages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this