TY - JOUR
T1 - Why local antibiotic resistance data matters – Informing empiric prescribing through local data collation, app design and engagement in Zambia
AU - Fwoloshi, Sombo
AU - Chola, Uchizi
AU - Nakazwe, Ruth
AU - Tatila, Timothy
AU - Mateele, Tebuho
AU - Kabaso, Mwewa
AU - Muzyamba, Theresa
AU - Mutwale, Ilunga
AU - Jones, Anja St Clair
AU - Islam, Jasmin
AU - Chikatula, Enock
AU - Mweemba, Aggrey
AU - Mbewe, Wilson
AU - Mulenga, Lloyd
AU - Aiken, Alexander M.
AU - Anitha Menon, J.
AU - Bailey, Sarah Lou
AU - Knight, Gwenan M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Control of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) relies on local knowledge and local intervention implementation. Effective antibiotic stewardship requires locally-suitable prescribing guidelines. We aimed to use a novel digital tool (the ZARIApp) and a participatory approach to help develop locally-relevant empiric antibiotic prescribing guidelines for two hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: We produced an AMR report using samples collected locally and routinely from adults within the prior two years (April 2020 – April 2022). We developed the ZARIApp, which provides prescribing recommendations based on local resistance data and antibiotic prescribing practices. We used qualitative evaluation of focus group discussions among healthcare professionals to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using the ZARIApp and identify the barriers to and enablers of this stewardship approach. Results: Resistance prevalence was high for many key pathogens: for example, 73% of 41 Escherichia coli isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone. We identified that high resistance rates were likely due to low levels of requesting and processing of microbiology samples from patients leading to insufficient and unrepresentative microbiology data. This emerged as the major barrier to generating locally-relevant guidelines. Through active stakeholder engagement, we modified the ZARIApp to better support users to generate empirical antibiotic guidelines within this context of unrepresentative microbiology data. Qualitative evaluation of focus group discussions suggested that the resulting ZARIApp was useful and easy to use. New antibiotic guidelines for key syndromes are now in place in the two study hospitals, but these have substantial residual uncertainty. Conclusions: Tools such as the free online ZARIApp can empower local settings to better understand and optimise how sampling and prescribing can help to improve patient care and reduce future AMR. However, the usability of the ZARIApp is severely limited by unrepresentative microbiology data; improved routine microbiology surveillance is vitally needed.
AB - Background: Control of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) relies on local knowledge and local intervention implementation. Effective antibiotic stewardship requires locally-suitable prescribing guidelines. We aimed to use a novel digital tool (the ZARIApp) and a participatory approach to help develop locally-relevant empiric antibiotic prescribing guidelines for two hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: We produced an AMR report using samples collected locally and routinely from adults within the prior two years (April 2020 – April 2022). We developed the ZARIApp, which provides prescribing recommendations based on local resistance data and antibiotic prescribing practices. We used qualitative evaluation of focus group discussions among healthcare professionals to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using the ZARIApp and identify the barriers to and enablers of this stewardship approach. Results: Resistance prevalence was high for many key pathogens: for example, 73% of 41 Escherichia coli isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone. We identified that high resistance rates were likely due to low levels of requesting and processing of microbiology samples from patients leading to insufficient and unrepresentative microbiology data. This emerged as the major barrier to generating locally-relevant guidelines. Through active stakeholder engagement, we modified the ZARIApp to better support users to generate empirical antibiotic guidelines within this context of unrepresentative microbiology data. Qualitative evaluation of focus group discussions suggested that the resulting ZARIApp was useful and easy to use. New antibiotic guidelines for key syndromes are now in place in the two study hospitals, but these have substantial residual uncertainty. Conclusions: Tools such as the free online ZARIApp can empower local settings to better understand and optimise how sampling and prescribing can help to improve patient care and reduce future AMR. However, the usability of the ZARIApp is severely limited by unrepresentative microbiology data; improved routine microbiology surveillance is vitally needed.
KW - Antibiotics
KW - Antimicrobial resistance
KW - Antimicrobial stewardship
KW - Digital epidemiology
KW - Microbiology sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177868750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.11.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.11.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 37980241
AN - SCOPUS:85177868750
SN - 1876-0341
VL - 16
SP - 69
EP - 77
JO - Journal of Infection and Public Health
JF - Journal of Infection and Public Health
ER -