Whose Science Did Government Follow? The Organisation of Scientific Advice to the UK Government in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Response

Richard Gleave*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The UK Government’s claim to be following the science in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been disputed. However, the UK has a highly structured approach to the provision of scientific advice in an emergency, though during the first phase of the response to COVID-19 this faced severe challenges. The Government’s normative model of organising scientific advice is analysed and an emergency scientific advisory system is presented. This provides an empirically derived and theoretically informed framework to understand the provision of advice to decision-makers during the first stages of the pandemic in 2020. Two case studies about the diversity of actors who provide advice and the evolution of the rules on social distance show the complex organisation of advice-giving work. Three theoretical lenses provide insight into the role of advice in influencing the response—complex adaptive system, dramaturgical and neo-institutional theories. Finally, lessons for the future organisation of scientific advice are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOrganizational Behaviour in Healthcare
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages39-69
Number of pages31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameOrganizational Behaviour in Healthcare
ISSN (Print)2662-1053
ISSN (Electronic)2662-1045

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose Science Did Government Follow? The Organisation of Scientific Advice to the UK Government in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this