Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What Do Diagnoses of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Specialist Sexual Health Services in England Tell Us about Chlamydia Control?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an outcome measure for the evaluation of chlamydia screening programs. We explore PID diagnoses in specialist sexual health services (SSHSs) in England to inform the evaluation of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, which was implemented nationally in 2008. 

Methods: We conducted descriptive analyses using data on diagnoses of PID-with and without Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC)-by age and year of birth, in SSHSs between 2009 and 2019 from the GUMCAD STI Surveillance System database. Rates were calculated per 100 000 females residing in England. 

Results: CT screening activity peaked in 2010. The rates of all PID diagnoses decreased between 2009 and 2019 by 39%. CT-associated PID (CT-PID) declined by 58%, and nonspecific PID declined by 37%. GC-PID increased by 34%. CT-PID decreased across all age groups with the highest observed decline, 71%, in 15-to 19-year-olds. A dose-response relationship was observed between CT-PID rates and screening, with rates lowest in those with the greatest exposure to screening. 

Conclusions: There was a marked decline in diagnoses of CT-PID, and nonspecific PID, at SSHSs after the introduction of widespread chlamydia screening, whereas GC-PID diagnoses increased. This ecological trend was broadly consistent with what we would have expected to see if widespread screening reduced the incidence of chlamydia-associated PID (and of nonspecific PID), as has been observed in randomized controlled trials of screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S113-S120
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volume224
Early online date15 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: P. H. was funded by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at University of Bristol. M. J. P. is supported by the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre.

Open Access: No Open Access licence

Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Citation: Grahame S Davis, Patrick J Horner, Malcolm J Price, Holly D Mitchell, Kate Soldan, What Do Diagnoses of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Specialist Sexual Health Services in England Tell Us About Chlamydia Control?, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 224, Issue Supplement_2, 15 August 2021, Pages S113–S120.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab175

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • chlamydia
  • chlamydia screening
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Do Diagnoses of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Specialist Sexual Health Services in England Tell Us about Chlamydia Control?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this