Using surveillance data to determine treatment rates and outcomes for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Sam Lattimore*, Will Irving, Sarah Collins, Celia Penman, Mary Ramsay, Hamid Jalal, Melanie Matthews, Rachael Smith, Chas Ashley, Peter Muir, Mark Atkins, Mark Green, Lesley Mayoh, John Croall, Tony Vicca, Julia Locklan, Sheila Waugh, Samreen Ijaz, Siew Lin Ngui, Richard TedderManoj Vallapil, Elizabeth Boxall, Janet Mowbray, David Lewis, Antony Hale, Ralph Henderson, David Johnson, Mark Zuckerman, Alan Blackley, Paul Klapper, Matthew Longbone, Mohammed Osman Hassan Ibrahim, Lisa Prichett, Josephine Silles, Louise Hesketh, Preston Lynne Ashton, Ian Hart, Tony Oliver, Xose Couto-Parada, Hasan Al-Ghusein, Phil Rice, Graham Hewitt, Gillian Underhill, Michael Kidd, Peter Luton, Mark Baker, James Nash

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


The aim of this work was to develop and validate an algorithm to monitor rates of, and response to, treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) across England using routine laboratory HCV RNA testing data. HCV testing activity between January 2002 and December 2011 was extracted from the local laboratory information systems of a sentinel network of 23 laboratories across England. An algorithm based on frequency of HCV RNA testing within a defined time period was designed to identify treated patients. Validation of the algorithm was undertaken for one center by comparison with treatment data recorded in a clinical database managed by the Trent HCV Study Group. In total, 267,887 HCV RNA test results from 100,640 individuals were extracted. Of these, 78.9% (79,360) tested positive for viral RNA, indicating an active infection, 20.8% (16,538) of whom had a repeat pattern of HCV RNA testing suggestive of treatment monitoring. Annual numbers of individuals treated increased rapidly from 468 in 2002 to 3,295 in 2009, but decreased to 3,110 in 2010. Approximately two thirds (63.3%; 10,468) of those treated had results consistent with a sustained virological response, including 55.3% and 67.1% of those with a genotype 1 and non-1 virus, respectively. Validation against the Trent clinical database demonstrated that the algorithm was 95% sensitive and 93% specific in detecting treatment and 100% sensitive and 93% specific for detecting treatment outcome. Conclusions: Laboratory testing activity, collected through a sentinel surveillance program, has enabled the first country-wide analysis of treatment and response among HCV-infected individuals. Our approach provides a sensitive, robust, and sustainable method for monitoring service provision across England.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1343-1350
Number of pages8
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Using surveillance data to determine treatment rates and outcomes for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this