Use of public water supply fluoride concentration as an indicator of population exposure to fluoride in England 1995–2015

David J. Roberts*, J. Morris, A. Wood, N. Q. Verlander, G. S. Leonardi, T. Fletcher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public health monitoring of Community Water Fluoridation (CWF) schemes requires estimates of exposure to fluoride in public water supplies (PWS). We aimed to use routine data to estimate population exposure to PWS-fluoride in England and to determine whether PWS-fluoride exposure from 2005 to 2015 could be used as a proxy for exposure for 1995–2004, when fluoride concentration data that could be linked to population health data were unavailable. We calculated annual mean water supply zone PWS-fluoride concentrations from monitoring data for 1995–2015, stratified by fluoridation scheme-flagging. We allocated annual 2005–2015 mean PWS-fluoride concentrations to small area boundaries to describe population exposure within five concentration categories (< 0.1 to ≥ 0.7 mg/L). We compared zone-level 1995–2004 and 2005–2015 mean PWS-fluoride concentrations using Spearman correlation. Most (72%) of the population received PWS with < 0.2 mg/L fluoride and 10% with ≥ 0.7 mg/L. Fluoride concentrations in 1995–2004 and 2005–2015 were similar (median 0.11 mg/L (lower quartile–upper quartile (LQ–UQ) 0.06–0.17) and 0.11 mg/L (LQ–UQ 0.07–0.17), respectively) and highly correlated (coefficient 0.93) if un-fluoridated but differed (1995–2004 median 0.78 mg/L (LQ–UQ 0.59–0.92); 2005–2015 0.84 mg/L (LQ–UQ 0.72–0.95)) and correlated weakly (coefficient 0.31) if fluoridated. Fluoride concentrations in 2005–2015 approximate those in 1995–2004 but with a greater risk of misclassification in fluoridation schemes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number514
JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume192
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the Drinking Water Inspectorate for provision of the routine monitoring data and water supply zone boundaries. We would like to acknowledge Diane Edwards for the GIS analysis used for this report and the other members of the PHE Water Fluoridation and Health Monitoring working group. This work contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Exposure assessment
  • Fluoridation
  • Fluoride
  • Monitoring
  • Surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of public water supply fluoride concentration as an indicator of population exposure to fluoride in England 1995–2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this