TY - JOUR
T1 - Type-specific HPV prevalence in invasive cervical cancer in the UK prior to national HPV immunisation programme
T2 - Baseline for monitoring the effects of immunisation
AU - Mesher, David
AU - Cuschieri, Kate
AU - Hibbitts, Sam
AU - Jamison, Jackie
AU - Sargent, Alex
AU - Pollock, Kevin G.
AU - Powell, Ned
AU - Wilson, Robbie
AU - McCall, Fiona
AU - Fiander, Alison
AU - Soldan, Katherine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Aims: To establish the human papillomavirus (HPV) type-specific prevalence in cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions in the UK prior to the introduction of national HPV vaccination. Methods: Specimens of cervical cancer (n=1235) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)3 (n=2268) were tested for HPV genotypes in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Data were pooled and weighted estimates presented. Results: Among cervical cancer cases, 95.8% were positive for at least one high-risk (HR) HPV type. Restricting to those with HR HPV, the proportion positive for HPV16 and/or HPV18 was similar across countries (weighted overall prevalence 83.0%). This proportion decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (p=0.0005). HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52 and/or HPV58 were detected in 16.1% of HR HPV-positive cervical cancers and there was no significant association with age for these types. For HR HPV-positive CIN3 cases, there was a similar age-specific pattern with the highest positivity of HPV16 and/or HPV18 in the youngest age group (77.2%). The proportion of HR HPV CIN3 cases positive for HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52 and/or HPV58 was 36.3% in those aged <30 years at diagnosis. Conclusions: The prevalence of HPV 16 and/or 18 was high in all UK countries and highest in those diagnosed at a younger age. The UK is well placed to monitor the impact of HPV vaccination on type-specific HPV prevalence in cervical disease.
AB - Aims: To establish the human papillomavirus (HPV) type-specific prevalence in cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions in the UK prior to the introduction of national HPV vaccination. Methods: Specimens of cervical cancer (n=1235) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)3 (n=2268) were tested for HPV genotypes in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Data were pooled and weighted estimates presented. Results: Among cervical cancer cases, 95.8% were positive for at least one high-risk (HR) HPV type. Restricting to those with HR HPV, the proportion positive for HPV16 and/or HPV18 was similar across countries (weighted overall prevalence 83.0%). This proportion decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (p=0.0005). HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52 and/or HPV58 were detected in 16.1% of HR HPV-positive cervical cancers and there was no significant association with age for these types. For HR HPV-positive CIN3 cases, there was a similar age-specific pattern with the highest positivity of HPV16 and/or HPV18 in the youngest age group (77.2%). The proportion of HR HPV CIN3 cases positive for HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52 and/or HPV58 was 36.3% in those aged <30 years at diagnosis. Conclusions: The prevalence of HPV 16 and/or 18 was high in all UK countries and highest in those diagnosed at a younger age. The UK is well placed to monitor the impact of HPV vaccination on type-specific HPV prevalence in cervical disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922193580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202681
DO - 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202681
M3 - Article
C2 - 25410654
AN - SCOPUS:84922193580
SN - 0021-9746
VL - 68
SP - 135
EP - 140
JO - Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - Journal of Clinical Pathology
IS - 2
ER -