Trends in sexually transmitted infections in general practice 1990-2000: Population based study using data from the UK general practice research database

Jackie A. Cassell*, Catherine H. Mercer, Lorna Sutcliffe, Irene Petersen, Amir Islam, M. Gary Brook, Jonathan D. Ross, George R. Kinghorn, Ian Simms, Gwenda Hughes, Azeem Majeed, Judith M. Stephenson, Anne M. Johnson, Andrew C. Hayward

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the contribution of primary care to the diagnosis and management of sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom, 1990-2000, in the context of increasing incidence of infections in genitourinary medicine clinics. Design: Population based study. Setting: UK primary care. Participants: Patients registered in the UK general practice research database. Main outcome measures: Incidence of diagnosed sexually transmitted infections in primary care and estimation of the proportion of major such infections diagnosed in primary care. Results: An estimated 23.0% of chlamydia cases in women but only 5.3% in men were diagnosed and treated in primary care during 1998-2000, along with 49.2% cases of non-specific urethritis and urethral discharge in men and 5.7% cases of gonorrhoea in women and 2.9% in men. Rates of diagnosis in primary care rose substantially in the late 1990s. Conclusions: A substantial and increasing number of sexually transmitted infections are diagnosed and treated in primary care in the United Kingdom, with sex ratios differing from those in genitourinary medicine clinics. Large numbers of men are treated in primary care for presumptive sexually transmitted infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-334
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume332
Issue number7537
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in sexually transmitted infections in general practice 1990-2000: Population based study using data from the UK general practice research database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this