Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children and young people in households and schools: A meta-analysis of population-based and contact-tracing studies

Russell Viner*, Claire Waddington, Oliver Mytton, Robert Booy, Joana Cruz, Joseph Ward, Shamez Ladhani, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths, Chris Bonell, G. J. Melendez-Torres

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The role of children and young people (CYP) in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in household and educational settings remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of contact-tracing and population-based studies at low risk of bias. 

Methods: We searched 4 electronic databases on 28 July 2021 for contact-tracing studies and population-based studies informative about transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from 0 to 19 year olds in household or educational settings. We excluded studies at high risk of bias, including from under-ascertainment of asymptomatic infections. We undertook multilevel random effects meta-analyses of secondary attack rates (SAR: contact-tracing studies) and school infection prevalence, and used meta-regression to examine the impact of community SARS-CoV-2 incidence on school infection prevalence. 

Findings: 4529 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in 37 included studies (16 contact-tracing; 19 population studies; 2 mixed studies). The pooled relative transmissibility of CYP compared with adults was 0.92 (0.68, 1.26) in adjusted household studies. The pooled SAR from CYP was lower (p = 0.002) in school studies 0.7% (0.2, 2.7) than household studies (7.6% (3.6, 15.9). There was no difference in SAR from CYP to child or adult contacts. School population studies showed some evidence of clustering in classes within schools. School infection prevalence was associated with contemporary community 14-day incidence (OR 1.003 (1.001, 1.004), p<0.001). 

Interpretation: We found no difference in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from CYP compared with adults within household settings. SAR were markedly lower in school compared with household settings, suggesting that household transmission is more important than school transmission in this pandemic. School infection prevalence was associated with community infection incidence, supporting hypotheses that school infections broadly reflect community infections. These findings are important for guiding policy decisions on shielding, vaccination school and operations during the pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-382
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume84
Issue number3
Early online date22 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: No funding obtained.

Open Access: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

Citation: Russell Viner, Claire Waddington, Oliver Mytton, Robert Booy, Joana Cruz, Joseph Ward, Shamez Ladhani, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths, Chris Bonell, G.J. Melendez-Torres, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children and young people in households and schools: A meta-analysis of population-based and contact-tracing studies, Journal of Infection, Volume 84, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 361-382,
ISSN 0163-4453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.026.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children and young people in households and schools: A meta-analysis of population-based and contact-tracing studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this