Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024

  • Dana Ogaz*
  • , Dolores Mullen
  • , George Baldry
  • , Danielle Jayes
  • , Dawn Phillips
  • , Catherine M. Lowndes
  • , David Reid
  • , Jordan Charlesworth
  • , Erna Buitendam
  • , David Phillips
  • , Gwenda Hughes
  • , Catherine H. Mercer
  • , John Saunders
  • , Kate Folkard
  • , Katy Sinka
  • , Hamish Mohammed
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sexual health service (SHS) delivery in England shifted substantially with rapid expansion of online services during the COVID-19 pandemic. While digital services may improve reach, limited data exist on unmet need for in-person SHS in England, especially among men and gender-diverse individuals who have sex with men, key populations disproportionately affected by sexual health inequalities. Methods: We analysed data from “Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health” (RiiSH) 2024 (Nov/Dec 2024), an online survey of UK-resident men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men. We assessed in-person SHS access and unmet need (tried but failed to access a SHS in-person) over the past year. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with unmet need. Results: Among 2404 participants living in England (median age 45 years, 88% White, 95% cisgender), 86% had ever accessed in-person SHS and 59% in the past year. Of those who tried to access in-person care in the past year, 12% (95% CI: 11%–14%) experienced unmet need, especially Outside London (15% vs 8% in London). Common barriers included unavailable (50%) or inconvenient (41%) appointment times. In adjusted multivariable analysis, unmet need continued to be lower among participants living in London (aOR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.44–0.92]), those financially comfortable (aOR: 0.69 [0.49–0.97]), and those reporting ≥1 marker(s) of sexual risk (e.g. HIV-PrEP use in the last year and/or in the last 3–4 months, the report of a bacterial STI diagnosis, engaging in chemsex, having had ≥10 male physical sex partners; aOR: 0.14 [0.10–0.20]). Unmet need was higher among participants with limiting long-term physical health conditions (aOR: 1.61 [1.12–2.30]) and those who reported ever using online postal self-sampling services for STI testing (OPSS) (aOR: 1.50 [1.07–2.09]). Conclusions: Despite high SHS engagement, one-in-eight reported unmet need for in-person SHS. Local service delivery guided by joint strategic needs assessments could help address unmet need for SHS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-547
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of STD and AIDS
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • homosexual
  • other
  • prevention
  • sexual behaviour

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this