The rapid detection of respiratory pathogens in critically ill children

John A. Clark*, Andrew Conway Morris, Martin D. Curran, Deborah White, Esther Daubney, Iain R.L. Kean, Vilas Navapurkar, Josefin Bartholdson Scott, Mailis Maes, Rachel Bousfield, M. Estée Török, David Inwald, Zhenguang Zhang, Shruti Agrawal, Constantinos Kanaris, Fahad Khokhar, Theodore Gouliouris, Stephen Baker, Nazima Pathan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Respiratory infections are the most common reason for admission to paediatric intensive care units (PICU). Most patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) receive broad-spectrum antimicrobials, despite low rates of bacterial culture confirmation. Here, we evaluated a molecular diagnostic test for LRTI to inform the better use of antimicrobials. Methods: The Rapid Assay for Sick Children with Acute Lung infection Study was a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study of mechanically ventilated children (> 37/40 weeks corrected gestation to 18 years) with suspected community acquired or ventilator-associated LRTI. We evaluated the use of a 52-pathogen custom TaqMan Array Card (TAC) to identify pathogens in non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (mini-BAL) samples. TAC results were compared to routine microbiology testing. Primary study outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of TAC, and time to result. Results: We enrolled 100 patients, all of whom were tested with TAC and 91 of whom had matching culture samples. TAC had a sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval (CI95) 66.9–98.7) and specificity of 97.9% (CI95 97.2–98.5) compared to routine bacterial and fungal culture. TAC took a median 25.8 h (IQR 9.1–29.8 h) from sample collection to result. Culture was significantly slower: median 110.4 h (IQR 85.2–141.6 h) for a positive result and median 69.4 h (IQR 52.8–78.6) for a negative result. Conclusions: TAC is a reliable and rapid adjunct diagnostic approach for LRTI in critically ill children, with the potential to aid early rationalisation of antimicrobial therapy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number11
    JournalCritical Care
    Volume27
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    This project is funded by the Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals (900240) (JAC, NP, MET, IRLK and SB) which provided funding for consumables and 16S rRNA gene sequencing of samples, in addition to the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The authors also receive support from the Gates Cambridge Trust (OPP1144) (JAC); the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Health Foundation Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MET); Wellcome Trust (215515) (SB); Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (WT 2055214/Z/16/Z) (ACM) MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MR/V006118/1) (ACM); and Action Medical Research (NP, SB, MET) (GN2751, GN2903).This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1144). Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.

    Funding Information:
    The study was sponsored by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Cambridge. Approval was granted by the Yorkshire and Humber-Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (REC ref 20/YH/0089 on 26 March 2020). The trial was registered prior to commencement on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04233268).

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2023, The Author(s).

    Keywords

    • Critical care
    • Diagnostic techniques
    • Healthcare-associated pneumonia
    • Paediatric
    • Pneumonia
    • Respiratory system

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The rapid detection of respiratory pathogens in critically ill children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this