The polonium-210 poisoning of Mr Alexander Litvinenko

John Harrison, Timothy Fell, Rich Leggett, David Lloyd, Matthew Puncher, Mike Youngman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)


    Mr Litvinenko died on 23 November 2006 after having been poisoned with polonium-210 on 1 November. Measurements of the polonium-210 content of post-mortem tissue samples and samples of urine and blood showed the presence of large amounts of 210Po. Autoradiography of hair samples showed two regions of 210Po activity, providing evidence of an earlier poisoning attempt during October 2006, resulting in absorption to blood of about one-hundredth of that estimated for 1 November. Intake by ingestion on 1 November was estimated to be around 4 GBq, assuming 10% absorption to blood, and the resulting organ doses reached estimated values that were generally in a range from about 20 Gy to over 100 Gy. Comparison with estimates of protracted alpha particle doses required to cause irreversible organ damage supported the conclusion that death was the inevitable consequence of multiple organ failure, with destruction of the haemopoietic bone marrow, as well as damage to kidneys and liver, being important contributors. If the earlier poisoning during October 2006 had not been followed by a second major intake on 1 November, it is possible that the earlier intake of around 40 MBq, with absorption of 4 MBq to blood, might have caused irreversible kidney damage over a prolonged period of months or years, with doses of approaching 3 Gy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)266-278
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Radiological Protection
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd.


    • dose assessments
    • organ damage
    • poison
    • polonium-210


    Dive into the research topics of 'The polonium-210 poisoning of Mr Alexander Litvinenko'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this