The impact of two commonly used neutralizing agents in water sampling bottles on legionella and pseudomonas bacteria recovery

S. Lai*, B. Nielsen, N. Andrews, K. C. Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Microbiological monitoring may be indicated by the local risk assessment of hospital water systems. When water sampling is carried out, it is imperative that the activity of any residual biocide is completely neutralized. Sodium thiosulphate pentahydrate (Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O) is commonly used to neutralize oxidizing biocides in water samples for microbiological testing. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dihydrate (Na2EDTA.2H2O) is recommended to neutralize silver–copper ionization treated water samples. However, there are inconsistencies in the recommended effective concentration. Furthermore, sampling bottles dosed with Na2EDTA.2H2O are not commercially available. 

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of Na2EDTA.2H2O as a neutralizing agent compared with sodium thiosulphate (Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O) on water samples treated with silver and copper ions and to assess the biocidal activity in water samples. 

Methods: An interlaboratory investigation was carried out using simulated water samples spiked with Legionella pneumophila or Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without silver and copper ions. Bacterial recovery was determined in sterile sampling bottles dosed with either 50 mg/L Na2EDTA.2H2O or 180 mg/L Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O as the chemical biocide neutralizing agent. 

Findings: Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O effectively complexed both silver and copper ions and inhibited biocidal activity. The 50 mg/L of Na2EDTA.2H2O continued to demonstrate significant biocidal activity in the spiked samples. 

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that Na2EDTA.2H2O is not an efficacious neutralizing agent on water samples treated with silver and copper ions. Sample bottles dosed with 180 mg/L Na₂S₂O₃·5H₂O were more effective in neutralizing silver and copper ions generated in water that had been treated by silver–copper ionization systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-51
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hospital Infection
Volume117
Early online date22 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This study was funded by Public Health England and ALS Life Sciences, United Kingdom.

Open Access: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Publisher Copyright: Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.

Citation: S. Lai, B. Nielsen, N. Andrews, K.C. Thompson, The impact of two commonly used neutralizing agents in water sampling bottles on legionella and pseudomonas bacteria recovery,
Journal of Hospital Infection, Volume 117, 2021, Pages 44-51, ISSN 0195-6701,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.07.007.

Keywords

  • Copper
  • EDTA
  • Legionella
  • Neutralization
  • Silver ionization
  • Sodium thiosulphate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of two commonly used neutralizing agents in water sampling bottles on legionella and pseudomonas bacteria recovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this