Abstract
Objective: To inform national policy making on the use of the 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine among risk groups we estimated the increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) outcomes among clinical risk groups. Three years of post 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) data was included to investigate the herd protection effects. Methods: Over 22,000 IPD patients in England (March 2002-March 2009 - aged 2 and over) were linked to their hospitalisation records. The prevalence of risk factors in these patients was compared to the prevalence of risk factors in the general population. Results: There was an increased odds ratio (OR) for hospitalisation (OR 11.7 2-15 years; 7.6 16-64; 2.7 65+) and death (OR 2.4 2-15 years, 3.9 16-64, 1.2 65+) from IPD among risk group. The most important risk factors that predict IPD are chronic liver disease, immunosuppression, and chronic respiratory diseases. Herd protection effects due to introduction of the 7-valent vaccine were identical in both patient groups as shown by the similar decline in the proportion of IPD caused by PCV7 serotypes in risk and non-risk groups. Conclusions: There is a marked increased risk of IPD among those with certain clinical conditions, suggesting potential benefit from a targeted vaccination approach. However, the indirect protection from conjugate vaccination of children suggests PCV vaccination of high-risk groups may not provide substantial additional benefit once herd immunity takes effect.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17-24 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Infection |
Volume | 65 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme , grant number: 039/0031 to AJvH and JS. The views expressed in the publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
AJvH, no conflict; NA, no conflict; PAW, no conflict; JS, no conflict; PG, no conflict; RG, has received assistance to attend scientific meetings from Wyeth (Pfizer) and GlaxoSmithKline, and his laboratory has received research funding from Wyeth (Pfizer) and GlaxoSmithKline; EM, no conflict.
Keywords
- Hospitalisation
- Invasive pneumococcal disease
- Linkage
- Mortality
- Risk
- Risk groups
- Vaccination