Systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals ≥18 years of age

  • Laura Comber*
  • , Eamon O Murchu
  • , Karen Jordan
  • , Sarah Hawkshaw
  • , Liam Marshall
  • , Michelle O'Neill
  • , Conor Teljeur
  • , Máirín Ryan
  • , Anna Sara Carnahan
  • , Jaime Jesús Pérez Martín
  • , Anna Hayman Robertson
  • , Kari Johansen
  • , Jorgen de Jonge
  • , Tyra Krause
  • , Nathalie Nicolay
  • , Hanna Nohynek
  • , Ioanna Pavlopoulou
  • , Richard Pebody
  • , Pasi Penttinen
  • , Marta Soler-Soneira
  • Ole Wichmann, Patricia Harrington
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review sought to assess the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (HD-IIV) for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals aged 18 years or older. A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases and grey literature sources up to 7 February 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) were included. The search returned 28,846 records, of which 36 studies were included. HD-IIV was shown to have higher relative vaccine efficacy in preventing influenza compared with standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD-IIV3) in older adults (Vaccine effectiveness (VE) = 24%, 95% CI 10–37, one RCT). One NRSI demonstrated significant effect for HD-IIV3 against influenza B (VE = 89%, 95% CI 47–100), but not for influenza A(H3N2) (VE = 22%, 95% CI −82 to 66) when compared with no vaccination in older adults. HD-IIV3 showed significant relative effect compared with SD-IIV3 for influenza-related hospitalisation (VE = 11.8%, 95% CI 6.4–17.0, two NRSIs), influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalisation (VE = 13.7%, 95% CI 9.5–17.7, three NRSIs), influenza-related hospital encounters (VE = 13.1%, 95% CI 8.4–17.7, five NRSIs), and influenza-related office visits (VE = 3.5%, 95% CI 1.5–5.5, two NRSIs). For safety, HD-IIV were associated with significantly higher rates of local and systemic adverse events compared with SD-IIV (combined local reactions, pain at injection site, swelling, induration, headache, chills and malaise). From limited data, compared with SD-IIV, HD-IIV were found to be more effective in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza, for a range of proxy outcome measures, and associated with more adverse events.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2330
JournalReviews in Medical Virology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • high-dose
  • human
  • influenza
  • influenza vaccines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals ≥18 years of age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this