TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review
T2 - Accuracy of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis
AU - Whiting, Penny F.
AU - Smidt, Nynke
AU - Sterne, Jonathan A.C.
AU - Harbord, Roger
AU - Burton, Anya
AU - Burke, Margaret
AU - Beynon, Rebecca
AU - Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
AU - Axford, John
AU - Dieppe, Paul
PY - 2010/4/6
Y1 - 2010/4/6
N2 - Background: Early recognition and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is important to prevent irreversible joint damage. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) have been suggested for early diagnosis. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of ACPA and rheumatoid factor in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early symptoms of the disease. Data Sources: 10 medical databases from inception to September 2009, with no language or publication restrictions, and references of included studies. Study Selection: Two independent reviewers screened searches. Full articles were assessed by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer to identify studies that reported 2 x 2 data on ACPA for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (by 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria). Data Extraction: One reviewer abstracted data on patient characteristics, ACPA details, and 2 x 2 data and assessed study quality by using the QUADAS tool. A second reviewer checked extractions. Data Synthesis: 151 studies were included, with considerable heterogeneity in sensitivity (range, 12% to 93%) and specificity (range, 63% to 100%). In cohort studies that investigated secondgeneration anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP2) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (<2 years), summary sensitivity and specificity were 57% (95% CI, 51% to 63%) and 96% (CI, 93% to 97%), respectively. Case-control and cross-sectional studies and studies of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis all overestimated sensitivity. Anti-CCP2 had greater specificity than rheumatoid factor (96% vs. 86%), with similar sensitivity. Evidence was insufficient to ascertain whether the combination of anti-CCP2 and rheumatoid factor provides additional benefit over anti-CCP2 alone. Limitations: Most studies used a diagnostic case-control design, which overestimated sensitivity. Items relating to study quality were rarely reported. Publication bias could not be assessed. Conclusion: Anti-CCP2 should be included in the work-up of patients with early symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.
AB - Background: Early recognition and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is important to prevent irreversible joint damage. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) have been suggested for early diagnosis. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of ACPA and rheumatoid factor in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early symptoms of the disease. Data Sources: 10 medical databases from inception to September 2009, with no language or publication restrictions, and references of included studies. Study Selection: Two independent reviewers screened searches. Full articles were assessed by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer to identify studies that reported 2 x 2 data on ACPA for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (by 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria). Data Extraction: One reviewer abstracted data on patient characteristics, ACPA details, and 2 x 2 data and assessed study quality by using the QUADAS tool. A second reviewer checked extractions. Data Synthesis: 151 studies were included, with considerable heterogeneity in sensitivity (range, 12% to 93%) and specificity (range, 63% to 100%). In cohort studies that investigated secondgeneration anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP2) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (<2 years), summary sensitivity and specificity were 57% (95% CI, 51% to 63%) and 96% (CI, 93% to 97%), respectively. Case-control and cross-sectional studies and studies of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis all overestimated sensitivity. Anti-CCP2 had greater specificity than rheumatoid factor (96% vs. 86%), with similar sensitivity. Evidence was insufficient to ascertain whether the combination of anti-CCP2 and rheumatoid factor provides additional benefit over anti-CCP2 alone. Limitations: Most studies used a diagnostic case-control design, which overestimated sensitivity. Items relating to study quality were rarely reported. Publication bias could not be assessed. Conclusion: Anti-CCP2 should be included in the work-up of patients with early symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951246621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00010
DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00010
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20368651
AN - SCOPUS:77951246621
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 152
SP - 456
EP - 464
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 7
ER -