Abstract
A mail questionnaire, collecting information mainly on occupational history, was sent to 50 subjects who had been interviewed at home with a longer questionnaire three years before, and to 26 subjects who refused at that time to be interviewed. The 50 subjects were sampled among controls enrolled in a population based case-control study on soft tissue sarcomas; the 26 were all non-respondent controls in the same study. The questionnaire was returned by 83% and 14% respectively. A comparison between home and mail interviews suggests that the quality of information is strictly comparable for 78% of the items. For discordant items, about 50% showed a better quality of information from home interviews; in the other 50% a better information was provided by the mail interview.
| Translated title of the contribution | Experimentation on a mail questionnaire for a case-control study |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 47-49 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Epidemiologia e Prevenzione |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 38 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1989 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Experimentation on a mail questionnaire for a case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver