Screening of immigrants in the UK for imported latent tuberculosis: A multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis

Manish Pareek, John P. Watson, L. Peter Ormerod, Onn Min Kon, Gerrit Woltmann, Peter J. White, Ibrahim Abubakar, Ajit Lalvani*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    170 Citations (Scopus)


    Background: Continuing rises in tuberculosis notifications in the UK are attributable to cases in foreign-born immigrants. National guidance for immigrant screening is hampered by a lack of data about the prevalence of, and risk factors for, latent tuberculosis infection in immigrants. We aimed to determine the prevalence of latent infection in immigrants to the UK to define which groups should be screened and to quantify cost-effectiveness. Methods: In our multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis we analysed demographic and test results from three centres in the UK (from 2008 to 2010) that used interferon-γ release-assay (IGRA) to screen immigrants aged 35 years or younger for latent tuberculosis infection. We assessed factors associated with latent infection by use of logistic regression and calculated the yields and cost-effectiveness of screening at different levels of tuberculosis incidence in immigrants' countries of origin with a decision analysis model. Findings: Results for IGRA-based screening were positive in 245 of 1229 immigrants (20%), negative in 982 (80%), and indeterminate in two (0·2%). Positive results were independently associated with increases in tuberculosis incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0·0006), male sex (p=0·046), and age (p<0·0001). National policy thus far would fail to detect 71% of individuals with latent infection. The two most cost-effective strategies were to screen individuals from countries with a tuberculosis incidence of more than 250 cases per 100 000 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] was £17 956 [£1=US$1·60] per prevented case of tuberculosis) and at more than 150 cases per 100 000 (including immigrants from the Indian subcontinent), which identified 92% of infected immigrants and prevented an additional 29 cases at an ICER of £20 819 per additional case averted. Interpretation: Screening for latent infection can be implemented cost-effectively at a level of incidence that identifies most immigrants with latent tuberculosis, thereby preventing substantial numbers of future cases of active tuberculosis. Funding: Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)435-444
    Number of pages10
    JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    MP is funded by a Medical Research Council Capacity Building Studentship. PJW thanks the Medical Research Council for funding. AL is a Wellcome Senior Research Fellow in Clinical Science and NIHR Senior Investigator. We thank all staff who assisted in extracting data from the various databases.


    Dive into the research topics of 'Screening of immigrants in the UK for imported latent tuberculosis: A multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this