TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (swine)
AU - EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
AU - EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
AU - Andreoletti, Olivier
AU - Budka, Herbert
AU - Buncic, Sava
AU - Collins, John D.
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Hald, Tine
AU - Havelaar, Arie
AU - Hope, James
AU - Klein, Günter
AU - Koutsoumanis, Kostas
AU - McLauchlin, James
AU - Müller-Graf, Christine
AU - Nguyen-The, Christophe
AU - Noerrung, Birgit
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Maradona, Miguel Prieto
AU - Ricci, Antonia
AU - Sofos, John
AU - Threlfall, John
AU - Vågsholm, Ivar
AU - Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
AU - Alexander, Jan
AU - Benford, Diane
AU - Boobis, Alan
AU - Ceccatelli, Sandra
AU - Cottrill, Bruce
AU - Cravedi, Jean Pierre
AU - Di Domenico, Alessandro
AU - Doerge, Daniel
AU - Dogliotti, Eugenia
AU - Edler, Lutz
AU - Farmer, Peter
AU - Filipič, Metka
AU - Fink-Gremmels, Johanna
AU - Fürst, Peter
AU - Guérin, Thierry
AU - Knutsen, Helle Katrine
AU - Machala, Miroslav
AU - Mutti, Antonio
AU - Schlatter, Josef
AU - Rose, Martin
AU - van Leeuwen, Rolaf
AU - Bøtner, Anette
AU - Broom, Donald
AU - Doherr, Marcus G.
AU - Domingo, Mariano
AU - Hartung, Jörg
AU - Keeling, Linda
AU - Koenen, Frank
AU - More, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 European Food Safety Authority
PY - 2011/10/1
Y1 - 2011/10/1
N2 - A qualitative risk assessment identified Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spp. as the most relevant biological hazards in the context of meat inspection of swine. A comprehensive pork carcass safety assurance is the only way to ensure their effective control. This requires setting targets to be achieved in/on chilled carcasses, which also informs what has to be achieved earlier in the food chain. Improved Food Chain Information (FCI) enables risk-differentiation of pig batches (hazard-related) and abattoirs (process hygiene-related). Risk reduction measures at abattoir level are focused on prevention of microbial contamination through technology- and process hygiene-based measures (GMP/GHP- and HACCP-based), including omitting palpation/incision during post-mortem inspection in routine slaughter, as well as hazard reduction/inactivation meat treatments if necessary. At farm level, risk reduction measures are based on herd health programmes, closed breeding pyramids and GHP/GFP. Chemical substances listed in Council Directive 96/23/EC were ranked into four categories. Dioxins, dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls and chloramphenicol were ranked as being of high potential concern. However, chemical substances in pork are unlikely to pose an immediate or short term health risk for consumers. Opportunities for risk-based inspection strategies by means of differentiated sampling plans taking into account FCI were identified. Regular update of sampling programmes and inclusion of inspection criteria for the identification of illicit use of substances were also recommended. Meat inspection is a key component of the overall surveillance system for pig health and welfare but information is currently under-utilised. The changes proposed to the pig meat inspection system will lead to some reduction in the detection probability of diseases and welfare conditions. The difference is likely to be minimal for diseases/conditions that affect several organs. To mitigate the reduced detection probability, palpation and/or incision should be conducted as a follow-up to visual inspection whenever abnormalities are seen.
AB - A qualitative risk assessment identified Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spp. as the most relevant biological hazards in the context of meat inspection of swine. A comprehensive pork carcass safety assurance is the only way to ensure their effective control. This requires setting targets to be achieved in/on chilled carcasses, which also informs what has to be achieved earlier in the food chain. Improved Food Chain Information (FCI) enables risk-differentiation of pig batches (hazard-related) and abattoirs (process hygiene-related). Risk reduction measures at abattoir level are focused on prevention of microbial contamination through technology- and process hygiene-based measures (GMP/GHP- and HACCP-based), including omitting palpation/incision during post-mortem inspection in routine slaughter, as well as hazard reduction/inactivation meat treatments if necessary. At farm level, risk reduction measures are based on herd health programmes, closed breeding pyramids and GHP/GFP. Chemical substances listed in Council Directive 96/23/EC were ranked into four categories. Dioxins, dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls and chloramphenicol were ranked as being of high potential concern. However, chemical substances in pork are unlikely to pose an immediate or short term health risk for consumers. Opportunities for risk-based inspection strategies by means of differentiated sampling plans taking into account FCI were identified. Regular update of sampling programmes and inclusion of inspection criteria for the identification of illicit use of substances were also recommended. Meat inspection is a key component of the overall surveillance system for pig health and welfare but information is currently under-utilised. The changes proposed to the pig meat inspection system will lead to some reduction in the detection probability of diseases and welfare conditions. The difference is likely to be minimal for diseases/conditions that affect several organs. To mitigate the reduced detection probability, palpation and/or incision should be conducted as a follow-up to visual inspection whenever abnormalities are seen.
KW - Meat inspection
KW - ante-mortem
KW - contaminants
KW - post-mortem
KW - residues
KW - safety
KW - surveillance
KW - swine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927676650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2351
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2351
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84927676650
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 9
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 10
M1 - 2351
ER -