TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update)
AU - EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
AU - Andreoletti, Olivier
AU - Lau Baggesen, Dorte
AU - Bolton, Declan
AU - Butaye, Patrick
AU - Cook, Paul
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Davies, Robert
AU - Fernández Escámez, Pablo S.
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Hald, Tine
AU - Havelaar, Arie
AU - Koutsoumanis, Kostas
AU - Lindqvist, Roland
AU - Nguyen-The, Christophe
AU - McLauchlin, James
AU - Nesbakken, Truls
AU - Prieto, Miguel
AU - Ricci, Antonia
AU - Ru, Giuseppe
AU - Sanaa, Moez
AU - Simmons, Marion
AU - Sofos, John
AU - Threlfall, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 European Food Safety Authority
PY - 2013/11/1
Y1 - 2013/11/1
N2 - EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-assessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended), and the completeness of the body of knowledge are assessed. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. The list of QPS recommended biological agents is reviewed and updated periodically. Therefore, the only valid list is the one in the most recently published scientific opinion. The 2013 update reviews previously assessed microorganisms including bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi, oomycetes and viruses used for plant protection purposes. All taxonomic units previously recommended for the QPS list had their status reconfirmed. The new notifications since the last QPS update were reviewed. Gluconobacter oxydans and Alphaflexiviridae were assessed for the first time and were recommended for the QPS list. The information of the previous opinion was updated for the taxonomic units on the QPS list. Qualifications for the taxonomic units included in the QPS recommended list were reviewed and confirmed. Filamentous fungi and enterococci were not recommended for the QPS list following updating and reviewing of current scientific knowledge.
AB - EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-assessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended), and the completeness of the body of knowledge are assessed. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. The list of QPS recommended biological agents is reviewed and updated periodically. Therefore, the only valid list is the one in the most recently published scientific opinion. The 2013 update reviews previously assessed microorganisms including bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi, oomycetes and viruses used for plant protection purposes. All taxonomic units previously recommended for the QPS list had their status reconfirmed. The new notifications since the last QPS update were reviewed. Gluconobacter oxydans and Alphaflexiviridae were assessed for the first time and were recommended for the QPS list. The information of the previous opinion was updated for the taxonomic units on the QPS list. Qualifications for the taxonomic units included in the QPS recommended list were reviewed and confirmed. Filamentous fungi and enterococci were not recommended for the QPS list following updating and reviewing of current scientific knowledge.
KW - QPS
KW - bacteria
KW - fungi
KW - safety
KW - virus
KW - yeast
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061109816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061109816
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 11
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 11
M1 - 3449
ER -