Abstract
Well-designed population-based seroepidemiologic studies can be used to refine estimates of infection severity and transmission, and are therefore an important component of epidemic surveillance. However, the interpretation of the results of seroepidemiologic studies for SARS-CoV-2 has been hampered to date principally by heterogeneity in the quality of the reporting of the results of the study and a lack of standardized methods and reporting. We provide here the ROSES-S: Reporting of Seroepidemiologic studies—SARS-CoV-2. This is an updated checklist of 22 items that should be included in the reporting of all SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiologic studies, irrespective of study design.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 561-568 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 26 Jun 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsOpen Access: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Citation: World Health Organization Seroepidemiology Technical Working Group. ROSES-S: Statement from the World Health Organization on the reporting of seroepidemiologic studies for SARS-CoV-2. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2021; 15: 561– 568.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12870
Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2
- emerging
- infectious diseases
- seroepidemiologic Studies