TY - JOUR
T1 - Residential radon and lung cancer - Detailed results of a collaborative analysis of individual data on 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14 208 persons without lung cancer from 13 epidemiologic studies in Europe
AU - Darby, Sarah
AU - Hill, David
AU - Deo, Harz
AU - Auvinen, Anssi
AU - Barros-Dios, Juan Miguel
AU - Baysson, Hélène
AU - Bochicchio, Francesco
AU - Falk, Rolf
AU - Farchi, Sara
AU - Figueiras, Adolfo
AU - Hakama, Matti
AU - Heid, Iris
AU - Hunter, Nezahat
AU - Kreienbrock, Lothar
AU - Kreuzer, Michaela
AU - Lagarde, Frédéric
AU - Mäkeläinen, Ilona
AU - Muirhead, Colin
AU - Oberaigner, Wilhelm
AU - Pershagen, Göran
AU - Ruosteenoja, Eeva
AU - Rosario, Angelika Schaffrath
AU - Tirmarche, Margot
AU - Tomášek, Ladislav
AU - Whitley, Elise
AU - Wichmann, Heinz Erich
AU - Doll, Richard
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Objectives: Studies seeking direct estimates of the lung cancer risk associated with residential radon exposure lasting several decades have been conducted in many European countries. Individually these studies have not been large enough to assess moderate risks reliably. Therefore data from all 13 European studies of residential radon and lung cancer satisfying certain prespecified criteria have been brought together and analyzed. Methods: Data were available for 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14 208 controls, all with individual smoking histories and residential radon histories determined by long-term radon gas measurements. Results: The excess relative risk of lung cancer per 100 Bq/m3 increase in the observed radon concentration was 0.08 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.03-0.16; P=0.0007] after control for confounding. The dose-response relationship was linear with no evidence of a threshold, and it remained significant when only persons with observed radon concentrations of <200 Bq/m3 were included. There was no evidence that the excess relative risk varied with age, sex, or smoking history. Removing the bias induced by random uncertainties related to radon exposure assessment increased the excess relative risk of lung cancer to 0.16 (95% CI 0.05-0.31) per 100 Bq/m3. With this correction, estimated risks at 0, 100, and 400 Bq/m3, relative to lifelong nonsmokers with no radon exposure, were 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6 for lifelong nonsmokers and 25.8, 29.9, and 42.3 for continuing smokers of 15-24 cigarettes/day. Conclusions: These data provide firm evidence that residential radon acts as a cause of lung cancer in the general population. They provide a solid basis for the formulation of policies with which to manage risk from radon and reduce deaths from the most common fatal cancer in Europe.
AB - Objectives: Studies seeking direct estimates of the lung cancer risk associated with residential radon exposure lasting several decades have been conducted in many European countries. Individually these studies have not been large enough to assess moderate risks reliably. Therefore data from all 13 European studies of residential radon and lung cancer satisfying certain prespecified criteria have been brought together and analyzed. Methods: Data were available for 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14 208 controls, all with individual smoking histories and residential radon histories determined by long-term radon gas measurements. Results: The excess relative risk of lung cancer per 100 Bq/m3 increase in the observed radon concentration was 0.08 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.03-0.16; P=0.0007] after control for confounding. The dose-response relationship was linear with no evidence of a threshold, and it remained significant when only persons with observed radon concentrations of <200 Bq/m3 were included. There was no evidence that the excess relative risk varied with age, sex, or smoking history. Removing the bias induced by random uncertainties related to radon exposure assessment increased the excess relative risk of lung cancer to 0.16 (95% CI 0.05-0.31) per 100 Bq/m3. With this correction, estimated risks at 0, 100, and 400 Bq/m3, relative to lifelong nonsmokers with no radon exposure, were 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6 for lifelong nonsmokers and 25.8, 29.9, and 42.3 for continuing smokers of 15-24 cigarettes/day. Conclusions: These data provide firm evidence that residential radon acts as a cause of lung cancer in the general population. They provide a solid basis for the formulation of policies with which to manage risk from radon and reduce deaths from the most common fatal cancer in Europe.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744476426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 16538937
AN - SCOPUS:33744476426
SN - 0356-6528
VL - 32
SP - 1
EP - 84
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Supplement
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Supplement
IS - 1
ER -