TY - JOUR
T1 - Remote triage incorporating symptom-based risk stratification for suspected head and neck cancer referrals
T2 - A prospective population-based study
AU - ENT UK, BAHNO and INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)
AU - Hardman, John C.
AU - Tikka, Theofano
AU - Paleri, Vinidh
AU - Nirmal Kumar, B.
AU - Jennings, Chris
AU - Repanos, Costa
AU - Stafford, Frank
AU - Ishii, Hiro
AU - Wheatley, Hugh
AU - Homer, Jarrod
AU - Jose, Jemy
AU - McLaren, Oliver
AU - Pracy, Paul
AU - Simo, Ricard
AU - Sood, Sanjai
AU - Lester, Shane
AU - Winter, Stuart
AU - Kerawala, Cyrus
AU - Ah-See, Kim
AU - Gomati, Anas
AU - Cooper, Fergus
AU - Thirumal, Vanushia
AU - Shakeel, Muhammad
AU - Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis
AU - Rogers, Michael
AU - Loh, Christopher
AU - Roode, Mila
AU - Kelly, Andrew
AU - McCrory, David
AU - Khan, Irfan
AU - Vijayakumar, Sabarinath
AU - Hans, Paul
AU - Shenton, Catriona
AU - Kallada, Sabir
AU - Puvanendran, Mark
AU - Kiakou, Maria
AU - Wong, Billy
AU - Fletcher, Leon
AU - Harding, Laura
AU - Chaurasia, Madhup
AU - Awad, Zaid
AU - Jaafar, Mustafa
AU - Cunning, Nina
AU - Bhatt, Yogesh M.
AU - Jama, Guled M.
AU - Sooriyamoorthy, Thushanth
AU - Galli, Fernando
AU - Pinto, Rohan
AU - Temple, Robert
AU - Ghaffar, Shehzad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
PY - 2021/11/15
Y1 - 2021/11/15
N2 - Background: Remote triage for suspected head and neck cancer (HNC) referrals was adopted by many institutions during the initial peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Its safety in this population has not been established. Methods: A 16-week, prospective, multicenter national service evaluation was started on March 23, 2020. Suspected HNC referrals undergoing remote triage in UK secondary care centers were identified and followed up for a minimum of 6 months to record the cancer status. Triage was supported by risk stratification using a validated calculator. Results: Data for 4568 cases were submitted by 41 centers serving a population of approximately 26 million. These represented 14.1% of the predicted maximum referrals for this population outside of pandemic times, and this gave the study a margin of error of 1.34% at 95% confidence. Completed 6-month follow-up data were available for 99.8% with an overall cancer rate of 5.6% (254 of 4557). The rates of triage were as follows: urgent imaging investigation, 25.4% (n = 1156); urgent face-to-face review, 27.8%; (n = 1268); assessment deferral, 30.3% (n = 1382); and discharge, 16.4% (n = 749). The corresponding missed cancers rates were 0.5% (5 of 1048), 0.3% (3 of 1149), 0.9% (12 of 1382), and 0.9% (7 of 747; P =.15). The negative predictive value for a nonurgent triage outcome and no cancer diagnosis was 99.1%. Overall harm was reported in 0.24% (11 of 4557) and was highest for deferred assessments (0.58%; 8 of 1382). Conclusions: Remote triage, incorporating risk stratification, may facilitate targeted investigations for higher risk patients and prevent unnecessary hospital attendance for lower risk patients. The risk of harm is low and may be reduced further with appropriate safety netting of deferred appointments. Lay Summary: This large national study observed the widespread adoption of telephone assessment (supported by a risk calculator) of patients referred to hospital specialists with suspected head and neck cancer during the initial peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The authors identified 4568 patients from 41 UK centers (serving a population of more than 26 million people) who were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Late cancers were identified, whether reviewed or investigated urgently (0.4%) or nonurgently (0.9%), but the overall rate of harm was low (0.2%), with the highest rate being seen with deferred appointments (0.6%).
AB - Background: Remote triage for suspected head and neck cancer (HNC) referrals was adopted by many institutions during the initial peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Its safety in this population has not been established. Methods: A 16-week, prospective, multicenter national service evaluation was started on March 23, 2020. Suspected HNC referrals undergoing remote triage in UK secondary care centers were identified and followed up for a minimum of 6 months to record the cancer status. Triage was supported by risk stratification using a validated calculator. Results: Data for 4568 cases were submitted by 41 centers serving a population of approximately 26 million. These represented 14.1% of the predicted maximum referrals for this population outside of pandemic times, and this gave the study a margin of error of 1.34% at 95% confidence. Completed 6-month follow-up data were available for 99.8% with an overall cancer rate of 5.6% (254 of 4557). The rates of triage were as follows: urgent imaging investigation, 25.4% (n = 1156); urgent face-to-face review, 27.8%; (n = 1268); assessment deferral, 30.3% (n = 1382); and discharge, 16.4% (n = 749). The corresponding missed cancers rates were 0.5% (5 of 1048), 0.3% (3 of 1149), 0.9% (12 of 1382), and 0.9% (7 of 747; P =.15). The negative predictive value for a nonurgent triage outcome and no cancer diagnosis was 99.1%. Overall harm was reported in 0.24% (11 of 4557) and was highest for deferred assessments (0.58%; 8 of 1382). Conclusions: Remote triage, incorporating risk stratification, may facilitate targeted investigations for higher risk patients and prevent unnecessary hospital attendance for lower risk patients. The risk of harm is low and may be reduced further with appropriate safety netting of deferred appointments. Lay Summary: This large national study observed the widespread adoption of telephone assessment (supported by a risk calculator) of patients referred to hospital specialists with suspected head and neck cancer during the initial peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The authors identified 4568 patients from 41 UK centers (serving a population of more than 26 million people) who were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Late cancers were identified, whether reviewed or investigated urgently (0.4%) or nonurgently (0.9%), but the overall rate of harm was low (0.2%), with the highest rate being seen with deferred appointments (0.6%).
KW - harm
KW - multicenter
KW - national
KW - observational
KW - telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113743517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.33800
DO - 10.1002/cncr.33800
M3 - Article
C2 - 34411287
AN - SCOPUS:85113743517
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 127
SP - 4177
EP - 4189
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 22
ER -