TY - JOUR
T1 - Qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to community pharmacy PrEP delivery for UK pharmacists and underserved community members using the COM-B model of behaviour change
AU - Harrison, China
AU - Family, Hannah
AU - Kesten, Joanna
AU - Denford, Sarah
AU - Scott, Jennifer
AU - Sabin, Caroline
AU - Copping, Joanna
AU - Harryman, Lindsey
AU - Cochrane, Sarah
AU - Saunders, John
AU - Hamilton-Shaw, Ross
AU - Horwood, Jeremy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.
PY - 2025/5/1
Y1 - 2025/5/1
N2 - Objectives Expanding delivery of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to community pharmacies could improve access, aligning well with the UK government's goals to eliminate new HIV acquisitions by 2030. Using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model for behaviour change, the aim of this research was to explore the barriers and facilitators of community pharmacy PrEP delivery, for pharmacists and community members. Methods Community members at elevated risk of acquiring HIV and community pharmacists were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed within the framework of the COM-B model. Results 17 interviews with pharmacists (pharmacy owners n=7; employed pharmacists n=6; locums n=4) and 24 with community members (black African women n=6; other women n=2; young adults aged 18-25 years n=6; transgender people n=6; female sex workers n=4) were carried out. Capability barriers included suboptimal awareness and knowledge of PrEP, pharmacy facilities and pharmacist roles in delivering public health services. Opportunity barriers included a lack of staff capacity, privacy and pharmacy screening and monitoring facilities. Motivational barriers included a concern that increased access could increase sexually transmitted infections and involve a financial cost. Capability facilitators included awareness raising, HIV and PrEP training and education. Opportunity facilitators included PrEP appointments and the accessibility of pharmacies. Motivational facilitators included a preference for pharmacy delivery over other models (eg, sexual health, General Practitioner (GP)), and a belief that it would be discrete and less stigmatising. Conclusion Pharmacy PrEP delivery is acceptable but for it to be feasible, results point to the need for the development of a behaviour change intervention focusing on education, training and awareness raising, targeting pharmacists and community members to stimulate patient activation and de-stigmatise HIV. This intervention would need to be facilitated by system and environmental changes (eg, commissioning service).
AB - Objectives Expanding delivery of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to community pharmacies could improve access, aligning well with the UK government's goals to eliminate new HIV acquisitions by 2030. Using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model for behaviour change, the aim of this research was to explore the barriers and facilitators of community pharmacy PrEP delivery, for pharmacists and community members. Methods Community members at elevated risk of acquiring HIV and community pharmacists were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed within the framework of the COM-B model. Results 17 interviews with pharmacists (pharmacy owners n=7; employed pharmacists n=6; locums n=4) and 24 with community members (black African women n=6; other women n=2; young adults aged 18-25 years n=6; transgender people n=6; female sex workers n=4) were carried out. Capability barriers included suboptimal awareness and knowledge of PrEP, pharmacy facilities and pharmacist roles in delivering public health services. Opportunity barriers included a lack of staff capacity, privacy and pharmacy screening and monitoring facilities. Motivational barriers included a concern that increased access could increase sexually transmitted infections and involve a financial cost. Capability facilitators included awareness raising, HIV and PrEP training and education. Opportunity facilitators included PrEP appointments and the accessibility of pharmacies. Motivational facilitators included a preference for pharmacy delivery over other models (eg, sexual health, General Practitioner (GP)), and a belief that it would be discrete and less stigmatising. Conclusion Pharmacy PrEP delivery is acceptable but for it to be feasible, results point to the need for the development of a behaviour change intervention focusing on education, training and awareness raising, targeting pharmacists and community members to stimulate patient activation and de-stigmatise HIV. This intervention would need to be facilitated by system and environmental changes (eg, commissioning service).
KW - HIV
KW - PREP
KW - Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214425815
U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056308
DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056308
M3 - Article
C2 - 39542715
AN - SCOPUS:85214425815
SN - 1368-4973
VL - 101
SP - 160
EP - 167
JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections
JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections
IS - 3
ER -