Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients

Mingzhu Sun*, Jayne Moquet, Michele Ellender, Simon Bouffler, Christophe Badie, Rachel Baldwin-Cleland, Kevin Monahan, Andrew Latchford, David Lloyd, Susan Clark, Nicola A. Anyamene, Elizabeth Ainsbury, David Burling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this review is to investigate the literature pertaining to the potential risks of low-dose ionizing radiation to Lynch syndrome patients by use of computed tomography (CT), either diagnostic CT colonography (CTC), standard staging CT or CT surveillance. Furthermore, this review explores the potential risks of using radiotherapy for treatment of rectal cancer in these patients. No data or longitudinal observational studies of the impact of radiation exposure on humans with Lynch syndrome were identified. Limited experimental studies utilizing cell lines and primary cells exposed to both low and high radiation doses have been carried out to help determine radio-sensitivity associated with DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency, the defining feature of Lynch syndrome. On balance, these studies suggest that mismatch repair deficient cells may be relatively radio-resistant (particularly for low dose rate exposures) with higher mutation rates, albeit no firm conclusions can be drawn. Mouse model studies, though, showed an increased risk of developing colorectal tumors in mismatch repair deficient mice exposed to radiation doses around 2 Gy. With appropriate ethical approval, further studies investigating radiation risks associated with CT imaging and radiotherapy relevant doses using cells/tissues derived from confirmed Lynch patients or genetically modified animal models are urgently required for future clinical guidance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-70
Number of pages10
JournalFamilial Cancer
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date20 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This work was partly supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, a partnership between UKHSA and Imperial College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher Copyright: © Crown 2022.

Citation: Sun, M., Moquet, J., Ellender, M. et al. Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients. Familial Cancer 22, 61–70 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-022-00299-9

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-022-00299-9

Keywords

  • DNA mismatch repair deficiency
  • Familial colorectal cancer
  • Ionizing radiation
  • Lynch syndrome
  • Radio-sensitivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this