Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: A qualitative study of healthcare providers in England

Vasiliki Papageorgiou*, Alexandra Wharton-Smith, Ines Campos-Matos, Helen Ward

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    29 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Aim: To explore healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of the implications of a patient data-sharing agreement between National Health Service (NHS) Digital and the Home Office on access to NHS services and quality of care received by migrant patients in England.

    Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis and constant-comparison approach.

    Participants: Eleven healthcare providers and one non-clinical volunteer working in community or hospital-based settings who had experience of migrants accessing NHS England services. Interviews were carried out in 2018.

    Setting: England.

    Results: Awareness and understanding of the patient data-sharing agreement varied among participants, who associated this with a perceived lack of transparency by the government. Participants provided insight into how they thought the data-sharing agreement was negatively influencing migrants' health-seeking behaviour, their relationship with clinicians and the safety and quality of their care. They referred to the policy as a challenge to their core ethical principles, explicitly patient confidentiality and trust, which varied depending on their clinical specialty.

    Conclusions: A perceived lack of transparency during the policy development process can result in suspicion or mistrust towards government among the health workforce, patients and public, which is underpinned by a notion of power or control. The patient data-sharing agreement was considered a threat to some of the core principles of the NHS and its implementation as adversely affecting healthcare access and patient safety. Future policy development should involve a range of stakeholders including civil society, healthcare professionals and ethicists, and include more meaningful assessments of the impact on healthcare and public health.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere033202
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2020

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information: The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London.

    Open Access: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

    Citation: Papageorgiou V, Wharton-Smith A, Campos-Matos I, et al. Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: a qualitative study of healthcare providers in England BMJ Open 2020;10:e033202.

    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033202

    Keywords

    • health policy
    • medical ethics
    • migrant health
    • public health
    • qualitative research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: A qualitative study of healthcare providers in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this