Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: A behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies

Aleksandra J. Borek*, Marta Wanat, Louise Atkins, Anna Sallis, Diane Ashiru Oredope, Elizabeth Beech, Christopher C. Butler, Tim Chadborn, Susan Hopkins, Leah Jones, Cliodna McNulty, Nia Roberts, Karen Shaw, Esther Taborn, Sarah Tonkin-Crine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective While various interventions have helped reduce antibiotic prescribing, further gains can be made. This study aimed to identify ways to optimise antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions by assessing the extent to which important influences on antibiotic prescribing are addressed (or not) by behavioural content of AMS interventions. Settings English primary care. Interventions AMS interventions targeting healthcare professionals' antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections. Methods We conducted two rapid reviews. The first included qualitative studies with healthcare professionals on self-reported influences on antibiotic prescribing. The influences were inductively coded and categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Prespecified criteria were used to identify key TDF domains. The second review included studies of AMS interventions. Data on effectiveness were extracted. Components of effective interventions were extracted and coded using the TDF, Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) taxonomy. Using prespecified matrices, we assessed the extent to which BCTs and intervention functions addressed the key TDF domains of influences on prescribing. Results We identified 13 qualitative studies, 41 types of influences on antibiotic prescribing and 6 key TDF domains of influences: beliefs about consequences', social influences', skills', environmental context and resources', intentions' and emotions'. We identified 17 research-tested AMS interventions; nine of them effective and four nationally implemented. Interventions addressed all six key TDF domains of influences. Four of these six key TDF domains were addressed by 50%-67% BCTs that were theoretically congruent with these domains, whereas TDF domain 'skills' was addressed by 24% of congruent BCTs and 'emotions' by none. Conclusions Further improvement of antibiotic prescribing could be facilitated by: (1) national implementation of effective research-tested AMS interventions (eg, electronic decision support tools, training in interactive use of leaflets, point-of-care testing); (2) targeting important, less-addressed TDF domains (eg, 'skills', 'emotions'); (3) using relevant, under-used BCTs to target key TDF domains (eg, forming/reversing habits', reducing negative emotions', social support'). These could be incorporated into existing, or developed as new, AMS interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere039284
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding This study was commissioned and funded by Public Health England Behavioural Insights, and was carried out as a collaboration between the University of Oxford and Public Health England, with support from the Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London. STC was supported by funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England (HPRU-2012-10041).

Publisher Copyright:
©

Keywords

  • primary care
  • public health
  • qualitative research
  • respiratory infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: A behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this