Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

No Evidence for Effects of Fitness Relevance or Sex Differences in a Virtual Hunting and Gathering Task

  • Michael F. Brown*
  • , Jared M. Batterman
  • , Joseph Leman
  • , Bethany Taylor
  • , Jung Kim
  • , Jennie Ruff
  • , Marie E. Saxon
  • , Andrew Stokesbury
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A computerized task could be completed by predicting the location of a moving target or by choosing several stationary targets. In a fitness-relevant condition, this task was presented to participants in terms of hunting and gathering food necessary for survival. In four experiments, there was no evidence that male and female participants differed in terms of their tendency to complete the task in these two ways. In three of the experiments, performance in the fitness-relevant condition was compared to performance in a control condition in which the task was presented as a computer game with no reference to hunting or gathering. No evidence for an effect of fitness relevance was found. These results challenge the idea that sex differences in spatial cognition are related to the sexual differentiation of foraging behavior during human history. They also suggest limitations on the role of fitness-relevant processing of information (“survival processing”) on cognitive performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-100
Number of pages17
JournalEvolutionary Psychological Science
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer International Publishing.

Keywords

  • Gathering hypothesis
  • Sex differences
  • Spatial cognition
  • Survival processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No Evidence for Effects of Fitness Relevance or Sex Differences in a Virtual Hunting and Gathering Task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this