Magnetic resonance imaging versus histopathology in wilms tumor and nephroblastomatosis: 3 examples of noncorrelation

  • Sharon G. Cox*
  • , Tracy Kilborn
  • , Komala Pillay
  • , Alan Davidson
  • , Alastair J.W. Millar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the principal tool for Wilms tumor (WT) assessment and follow-up. MRI and histopathologic findings were not congruent in 2 of the q30 scanned patients with renal masses (2008 to 2011). Three lesions thought to be WT on MRI were found to be a sclerotic nephrogenic rest (1), cystic renal dysplasia (1), and focal chronic pyelonephritis (1). The "typical" features suggesting nephroblastomatosis and WT on MRI are unreliable and such lesions require biopsy for histopathologic diagnosis, especially when nephron-sparing surgery is necessary to preserve renal function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e81-e84
JournalJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • nephroblastoma
  • nephrogenic rests
  • tumor histology
  • Wilms tumor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic resonance imaging versus histopathology in wilms tumor and nephroblastomatosis: 3 examples of noncorrelation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this