In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from a series of surveillance studies in England: 2014–2018

Vanya Gant*, Abid Hussain, Malcolm Bain, Christopher Longshaw, Anne Santerre Henriksen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) demonstrating extensive, multiple antimicrobial resistance is increasing in England, leaving few treatment choices. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved in Europe for the treatment of aerobic GNB infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report pooled data for a clinical isolate set collected in England between 2014–2018. Methods: MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Muller–Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints. In the absence of a species-specific breakpoint, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Results: Of 1886 isolates from England [74.1% Enterobacterales (18.7% Escherichia coli, 17.2% Klebsiella pneumoniae), 25.9% non-fermenters (18.4% Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3.7% Acinetobacter baumannii)], 98.7% were cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales (99.0%) was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than ceftolozane/tazobactam (94.3%), but similar to meropenem (99.3%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (99.4%). Overall, cefiderocol susceptibility (98.0%) in non-fermenters was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than comparators (range, 84.5–92.4%). Susceptibility to cefiderocol was 98.3–99.6% by infection source and was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than comparators for isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia (cefiderocol, 98.3%; comparators range, 79.8–93.8%). Excluding intrinsically meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 47/1846 isolates (2.5%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were susceptible to cefiderocol (95.0%). All S. maltophilia isolates (40/40) were cefiderocol-susceptible. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of clinical isolates from England, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, was cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant strains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

Keywords

  • Carbapenem resistance
  • Epidemiology
  • Gram-negative
  • Resistance
  • Surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from a series of surveillance studies in England: 2014–2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this