TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving sexual health through partner notification
T2 - the LUSTRUM mixed-methods research Programme including RCT of accelerated partner therapy
AU - Estcourt, Claudia S.
AU - Mapp, Fiona
AU - Owusu, Melvina Woode
AU - Low, Nicola
AU - Flowers, Paul
AU - Copas, Andrew
AU - Roberts, Tracy E.
AU - Mercer, Catherine H.
AU - Saunders, John
AU - Nandwani, Rak
AU - Althaus, Christian L.
AU - Stirrup, Oliver
AU - Symonds, Merle
AU - Howarth, Alison R.
AU - Johnson, Anne M.
AU - Ogwulu, Chidubem Okeke
AU - Pothoulaki, Maria
AU - Vojt, Gabriele
AU - Wayal, Sonali
AU - Brice, Susie
AU - Comer-Schwartz, Alex
AU - Tostevin, Anna
AU - Williams, Eleanor
AU - Lasoye, Sarah
AU - McQueen, Jean
AU - Abdali, Zainab
AU - Cassell, Jackie A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Estcourt et al.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Sexually transmitted infections disproportionately affect young people and men who have sex with men. Chlamydia is Britain’s most common sexually transmitted infection. Partner notification is a key intervention to reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus but is hard to implement. Accelerated partner therapy is a promising new approach. Objectives: 1. determine the effectiveness, costs and acceptability of accelerated partner therapy for chlamydia in heterosexual people 2. model the cost effectiveness of accelerated partner therapy and impact on chlamydia transmission 3. develop and cost partner notification interventions for men who have sex with men. Design: Mixed-methods study to develop a new sex partner classification and optimise accelerated partner therapy; cluster crossover randomised controlled trial of accelerated partner therapy, with process and cost-consequence evaluation; dynamic modelling and health economic evaluation; systematic review of economic studies of partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men; qualitative research to co-design a novel partner notification intervention for men who have sex with men with bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Settings: Sexual health clinics and community services in England and Scotland. Participants: Women and men, including men who have sex with men and people with mild learning disabilities. Interventions: Accelerated partner therapy offered as an additional partner notification method. Main outcome measures: Proportion of index patients with positive repeat chlamydia test (primary outcome); proportion of sex partners treated; costs per major outcome averted and quality-adjusted life-year; predicted chlamydia prevalence; experiences of accelerated partner therapy. Data sources: Randomised controlled trial: partnership type, resource use, outcomes, qualitative data: economic analysis, modelling and systematic review: resource use and unit costs from the randomised controlled trial, secondary sources. Results: The sex partner classification defined five types. Accelerated partner therapy modifications included simplified self-sampling packs and creation of training films. We created a clinical management and partner notification data collection system.
AB - Background: Sexually transmitted infections disproportionately affect young people and men who have sex with men. Chlamydia is Britain’s most common sexually transmitted infection. Partner notification is a key intervention to reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus but is hard to implement. Accelerated partner therapy is a promising new approach. Objectives: 1. determine the effectiveness, costs and acceptability of accelerated partner therapy for chlamydia in heterosexual people 2. model the cost effectiveness of accelerated partner therapy and impact on chlamydia transmission 3. develop and cost partner notification interventions for men who have sex with men. Design: Mixed-methods study to develop a new sex partner classification and optimise accelerated partner therapy; cluster crossover randomised controlled trial of accelerated partner therapy, with process and cost-consequence evaluation; dynamic modelling and health economic evaluation; systematic review of economic studies of partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men; qualitative research to co-design a novel partner notification intervention for men who have sex with men with bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Settings: Sexual health clinics and community services in England and Scotland. Participants: Women and men, including men who have sex with men and people with mild learning disabilities. Interventions: Accelerated partner therapy offered as an additional partner notification method. Main outcome measures: Proportion of index patients with positive repeat chlamydia test (primary outcome); proportion of sex partners treated; costs per major outcome averted and quality-adjusted life-year; predicted chlamydia prevalence; experiences of accelerated partner therapy. Data sources: Randomised controlled trial: partnership type, resource use, outcomes, qualitative data: economic analysis, modelling and systematic review: resource use and unit costs from the randomised controlled trial, secondary sources. Results: The sex partner classification defined five types. Accelerated partner therapy modifications included simplified self-sampling packs and creation of training films. We created a clinical management and partner notification data collection system.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85188959256
U2 - 10.3310/TRQW3886
DO - 10.3310/TRQW3886
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188959256
SN - 2050-4322
VL - 12
SP - ix-55
JO - Programme Grants for Applied Research
JF - Programme Grants for Applied Research
IS - 2
ER -