Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implications for driving based on the risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke

  • Kai Michael Schubert
  • , Giulio Bicciato
  • , Lucia Sinka
  • , Laura Abraira
  • , Estevo Santamarina
  • , José Álvarez-Sabín
  • , Carolina Ferreira-Atuesta
  • , Mira Katan
  • , Natalie Scherrer
  • , Robert Terziev
  • , Nico Döhler
  • , Barbara Erdélyi-Canavese
  • , Ansgar Felbecker
  • , Philip Siebel
  • , Michael Winklehner
  • , Tim J. Von Oertzen
  • , Judith N. Wagner
  • , Gian Luigi Gigli
  • , Annacarmen Nilo
  • , Francesco Janes
  • Giovanni Merlino, Mariarosaria Valente, María Paula Zafra-Sierra, Luis Carlos Mayor-Romero, Julian Conrad, S. Evers, Piergiorgio Lochner, Frauke Roell, Francesco Brigo, Carla Bentes, Rita Peralta, Teresa Pinho E Melo, Mark R. Keezer, John Sidney Duncan, Josemir W. Sander, Barbara Tettenborn, Matthias Koepp, Marian Galovic*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background In addition to other stroke-related deficits, the risk of seizures may impact driving ability after stroke. Methods We analysed data from a multicentre international cohort, including 4452 adults with acute ischaemic stroke and no prior seizures. We calculated the Chance of Occurrence of Seizure in the next Year (COSY) according to the SeLECT 2.0 prognostic model. We considered COSY<20% safe for private and <2% for professional driving, aligning with commonly used cut-offs. Results Seizure risks in the next year were mainly influenced by the baseline risk-stratified according to the SeLECT 2.0 score and, to a lesser extent, by the poststroke seizure-free interval (SFI). Those without acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT 2.0 0-6 points) had low COSY (0.7%-11%) immediately after stroke, not requiring an SFI. In stroke survivors with acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT 2.0 3-13 points), COSY after a 3-month SFI ranged from 2% to 92%, showing substantial interindividual variability. Stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus (SeLECT 2.0 7-13 points) had the highest risk (14%-92%). Conclusions Personalised prognostic models, such as SeLECT 2.0, may offer better guidance for poststroke driving decisions than generic SFIs. Our findings provide practical tools, including a smartphone-based or web-based application, to assess seizure risks and determine appropriate SFIs for safe driving.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-837
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume95
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
  • EPILEPSY
  • STROKE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implications for driving based on the risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this