Impact and evaluation of international cancer control congresses

Kavita Sarwal*, Edward J. Trapido, Simon Sutcliffe, You Lin Qiao

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International meetings on various aspects of cancer- its etiology, its diagnosis, its treatment, its palliation, and its prevention and control are held frequently. Many have similar themes, and many seek and receive the same speakers and audiences. A fundamental question arises: what difference does any individual meeting/congress/ conference make or add to our understanding of the relevant issues? While many meetings conduct evaluations at the end of the Congress, few use evaluation as a tool to guide design, implementation, and evaluation of both short and long term impacts, and address the question of "what difference did the Congress make". The International Cancer Control Congresses, which are held biennially in different regions of the world, took the opportunity to use evaluation in this way, and ask the relevant questions. This paper describes that evaluation session of the ICCC4, held in Seoul, Korea in November 2011, which was part of the larger evaluation issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1159-1163
Number of pages5
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer control
  • Conferences
  • Declarations
  • Evaluation
  • Impact
  • Logic model
  • Strategic plan

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact and evaluation of international cancer control congresses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this