Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

High prevalence of coinfection of azithromycin-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium with other STIs: A prospective observational study of London-based symptomatic and STI-contact clinic attendees

  • Claire E. Broad
  • , Martina Furegato
  • , Mark A. Harrison
  • , Marcus J. Pond
  • , Ngee Keong Tan
  • , Sandra Okala
  • , Sebastian S. Fuller
  • , Emma M. Harding-Esch
  • , S. Tariq Sadiq*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives Azithromycin treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) may not be adequate to treat concomitant Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection, and particularly if MG has macrolide resistance-associated mutations (MG-MRAMs). We estimated prevalence of coinfections of CT with MG carrying MRAM, and risk factors for MG-MRAM among a sexual health clinic population. Study design and setting Among symptomatic and STI-contact clinic attendees in London, prevalence of CT-MG coinfection and MG-MRAM were estimated using nucleic acid amplification testing and Sanger sequencing, respectively, and their associated risk factors analysed using logistic regression. Results MG prevalence was 7.5% (23/307), 17.3% (30/173), and 11.4% (8/70) in females, men who have sex with women (MSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM), respectively; MG coinfection in CT-infected participants represented 28.0% (7/25), 13.5% (5/37), 0.0% (0/0), respectively. Presence of MG-MRAM was 39.1% (9/23) in female swabs, 70.0% (21/30) in MSW urine and 83.3% (5/6) in MSM rectal swabs. In multivariate analyses, coinfection with another STI was strongly associated with MG-MRAM (OR: 7.19; 95% CI: 2.4 to 21.5). Conclusion A significant proportion of participants in our study of symptomatic patients and STI contacts were infected with macrolide-resistant MG, suggesting that testing for MG and MRAM, for MG positives, might be clinically useful. The findings also suggest services explore potential benefits of testing CT positive samples for MG in these patient groups. Where MG testing is not available, potential high rates of MG coinfection should be borne in mind when considering azithromycin in the treatment of CT among STI contacts and symptomatic patients.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)63-68
    Number of pages6
    JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
    Volume97
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    Funding This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, Invention for Innovation (i4i) grant: ’A Point of Care Antimicrobial Resistance test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium infection - Ensuring accurate therapy and antibiotic stewardship in sexual health medicine’ (II-LB-0214-20005).

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • M. genitalium
    • antimicrobial resistance
    • azithromycin
    • chlamydia infection
    • gonorrhoea

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'High prevalence of coinfection of azithromycin-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium with other STIs: A prospective observational study of London-based symptomatic and STI-contact clinic attendees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this