Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and Non-European high income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Shelagh M. Redmond, Karin Alexander-Kisslig, Sarah C. Woodhall, Ingrid V.F. Van Den Broek, Jan Van Bergen, Helen Ward, Anneli Uusküla, Björn Herrmann, Berit Andersen, Hannelore M. Götz, Otilia Sfetcu, Nicola Low

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    60 Citations (Scopus)


    Background Accurate information about the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis is needed to assess national prevention and control measures. Methods We systematically reviewed population-based cross-sectional studies that estimated chlamydia prevalence in European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) Member States and non-European high income countries from January 1990 to August 2012. We examined results in forest plots, explored heterogeneity using the I2 statistic, and conducted random effects meta-analysis if appropriate. Meta-regression was used to examine the relationship between study characteristics and chlamydia prevalence estimates. Results We included 25 population-based studies from 11 EU/EEA countries and 14 studies from five other high income countries. Four EU/EEAMember States reported on nationally representative surveys of sexually experienced adults aged 18-26 years (response rates 52-71%). In women, chlamydia point prevalence estimates ranged from3.0-5.3%; the pooled average of these estimates was 3.6%(95%CI 2.4, 4.8, I2 0%). In men, estimates ranged from 2.4-7.3% (pooled average 3.5%; 95%CI 1.9, 5.2, I2,> 27%). Estimates in EU/EEA Member States were statistically consistent with those in other high income countries (I2 0% for women, 6%for men). There was statistical evidence of an association between survey response rate and estimated chlamydia prevalence; estimates were higher in surveys with lower response rates, (p = 0.003 in women, 0.018 inmen). Conclusions Population-based surveys that estimate chlamydia prevalence are at risk of participation bias owing to low response rates. Estimates obtained in nationally representative samples of the general population of EU/EEA Member States are similar to estimates from other high income countries.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0115753
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2015

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2015 Redmond et al.


    Dive into the research topics of 'Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and Non-European high income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this