Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Foodborne general outbreaks of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in England and Wales 1992-2002: Where are the risks?

  • Iain A. Gillespie*
  • , S. J. O'Brien
  • , G. K. Adak
  • , Thomas Cheasty
  • , G. Willshaw
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2002, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 (STEC O157) accounted for 44 of the 1645 foodborne general outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease reported to the Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. These outbreaks, although rare, were characterized by severe infection, with 169 hospital admissions and five deaths reported. STEC O157 outbreaks were compared with other pathogens to identify factors associated with this pathogen. Single risk variable analysis and logistic regression were employed. Two distinct aetiologies were identified. Foodborne outbreaks of STEC O157 infection in England and Wales were independently associated with farms, which related to milk and milk products, and with red meats/meat products, which highlighted butchers' shops as a cause for concern. The introduction and adherence to effective control measures, based on the principles of hazard analysis, provide the best means of minimizing the risk of foodborne infection with this pathogen.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)803-808
    Number of pages6
    JournalEpidemiology and Infection
    Volume133
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2005

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Foodborne general outbreaks of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in England and Wales 1992-2002: Where are the risks?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this