Abstract
Background: Social inequalities in breast cancer survival are smaller when the cancer is screen-detected. We examined survival from screen-detected and non screen-detected breast cancer by ethnicity and deprivation.Methods: Cancer registry data for 20 283 women aged 50-70 years, diagnosed between 1989-2011 and invited for screening, were linked with screening and ethnicity data. We examined Asian, Black and White groups, less deprived and middle/more deprived women. Net survival was estimated using ethnic-and deprivation-specific life tables. Estimates were corrected for lead-time bias and over-diagnosis.Results: Net survival varied by screening history. No significant differences in survival were found by ethnicity. Five-year net survival was 90.0% (95% CI, 89.3-90.8%) in less deprived groups and 86.7% (85.9-87.4%) among middle/more deprived women. Screening benefitted all ethnic and both deprivation groups. Whether screen-detected or not, more deprived women had significantly poorer outcomes: 5-year net survival was 78.0% (76.7-79.2%) for deprived women who were not screen-detected compared with 94.0% (93.1-95.1%) for less deprived women who were screen-detected.Conclusions: The three ethnic groups differed little in their breast cancer survival. Although screening confers a survival benefit to all, there are still wide disparities in survival by deprivation. More needs to be done to determine what underlies these differences and tackle them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 548-555 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | British Journal of Cancer |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Jul 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethnicity, deprivation and screening: Survival from breast cancer among screening-eligible women in the West Midlands diagnosed from 1989 to 2011'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver