TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the COVID-19 infection fatality ratio accounting for seroreversion using statistical modelling
AU - Brazeau, Nicholas F.
AU - Verity, Robert
AU - Jenks, Sara
AU - Fu, Han
AU - Whittaker, Charles
AU - Winskill, Peter
AU - Dorigatti, Ilaria
AU - Walker, Patrick G.T.
AU - Riley, Steven
AU - Schnekenberg, Ricardo P.
AU - Hoeltgebaum, Henrique
AU - Mellan, Thomas A.
AU - Mishra, Swapnil
AU - Unwin, H. Juliette T.
AU - Watson, Oliver J.
AU - Cucunubá, Zulma M.
AU - Baguelin, Marc
AU - Whittles, Lilith
AU - Bhatt, Samir
AU - Ghani, Azra C.
AU - Ferguson, Neil M.
AU - Okell, Lucy C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: The infection fatality ratio (IFR) is a key statistic for estimating the burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been continuously debated throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The age-specific IFR can be quantified using antibody surveys to estimate total infections, but requires consideration of delay-distributions from time from infection to seroconversion, time to death, and time to seroreversion (i.e. antibody waning) alongside serologic test sensitivity and specificity. Previous IFR estimates have not fully propagated uncertainty or accounted for these potential biases, particularly seroreversion. Methods: We built a Bayesian statistical model that incorporates these factors and applied this model to simulated data and 10 serologic studies from different countries. Results: We demonstrate that seroreversion becomes a crucial factor as time accrues but is less important during first-wave, short-term dynamics. We additionally show that disaggregating surveys by regions with higher versus lower disease burden can inform serologic test specificity estimates. The overall IFR in each setting was estimated at 0.49–2.53%. Conclusion: We developed a robust statistical framework to account for full uncertainties in the parameters determining IFR. We provide code for others to apply these methods to further datasets and future epidemics.
AB - Background: The infection fatality ratio (IFR) is a key statistic for estimating the burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been continuously debated throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The age-specific IFR can be quantified using antibody surveys to estimate total infections, but requires consideration of delay-distributions from time from infection to seroconversion, time to death, and time to seroreversion (i.e. antibody waning) alongside serologic test sensitivity and specificity. Previous IFR estimates have not fully propagated uncertainty or accounted for these potential biases, particularly seroreversion. Methods: We built a Bayesian statistical model that incorporates these factors and applied this model to simulated data and 10 serologic studies from different countries. Results: We demonstrate that seroreversion becomes a crucial factor as time accrues but is less important during first-wave, short-term dynamics. We additionally show that disaggregating surveys by regions with higher versus lower disease burden can inform serologic test specificity estimates. The overall IFR in each setting was estimated at 0.49–2.53%. Conclusion: We developed a robust statistical framework to account for full uncertainties in the parameters determining IFR. We provide code for others to apply these methods to further datasets and future epidemics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139816150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s43856-022-00106-7
DO - 10.1038/s43856-022-00106-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139816150
SN - 2730-664X
VL - 2
JO - Communications Medicine
JF - Communications Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 54
ER -