Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2 immune escape variants can alter existing vaccine effectiveness. In September 2023, we aimed to predict the neutralising response against BA.2.86 offered by XBB-lineage vaccines before vaccine roll-out utilising XBB.1.5 convalescent sera. We then assessed the response to XBB-lineage boosters from different individuals in the same cohort. Methods: A total of 78 sera samples (pre/post-XBB.1.5 infection and pre/post-XBB-lineage vaccination) were tested for live microneutralisation against SARS-CoV-2 Victoria and Omicron subvariants. Geometric means (GM) of neutralising antibody titres (nAbT) pre- and post-infection/vaccination were compared. Results: After XBB.1.5 infection, a 4-fold increase in neutralising antibody titres against BA.2.86 was observed compared to pre-infection titres (GM 51 vs 210, p ≤ 0.0001). A similar increase in BA.2.86 nAbT was seen post-XBB-lineage vaccination (GM 144 vs 600, fold change = 4.17, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion: XBB.1.5 infection was a suitable proxy to predict the neutralisation response following XBB-lineage vaccination. Our findings may support future vaccine development and vaccination strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 126898 |
| Journal | Vaccine |
| Volume | 51 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccines
- Immunity
- Neutralising antibodies
- Pandemic preparedness
- SARS-CoV-2
- SARS-CoV-2 serology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating neutralising antibody responses against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants utilising convalescent sera before the roll-out of XBB-lineage vaccines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver