Erratum: Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (J. Radiol. Prot. (2022) 42 (023001) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac670d)

Nobuhiko Ban; Enora Cleéro; Ludovic Vaillant; Wei Zhang; Nobuyuki Hamada; Dale Preston; Dominique Laurier

doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f

Erratum: Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (J. Radiol. Prot. (2022) 42 (023001) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac670d)

Nobuhiko Ban^*, Enora Cleéro, Ludovic Vaillant, Wei Zhang, Nobuyuki Hamada, Dale Preston, Dominique Laurier

^*Corresponding author for this work

Radiation Effects

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In our paper that provided a summary of ICRP Publication 152 [1] as a memorandum, the models for leukaemia were not correctly described. The excess absolute risk (EAR) model model calculates the risk per 10 000 persons per year, and the explanation for the parameter ß in table 3.4 was intended to indicate that point. However, the description ‘Excess cases per 10 000 persons per year per Gy for time since exposure centred at 25 years’ is not correct as ß is a coefficient for the linear term of dose in the linear-quadratic model. The model for the baseline incidence also yields the number of cases per 10 000 persons per year, but there was no description about it. Corrections should be made as follows. Page 4, table 3. (Table Presented).

Original language	English
Article number	039501
Journal	Journal of Radiological Protection
Volume	42
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f
Publication status	Published - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f

Cite this

@article{5980fb2a44fd4f69892e6f8b1bed8b29,

title = "Erratum: Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (J. Radiol. Prot. (2022) 42 (023001) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac670d)",

abstract = "In our paper that provided a summary of ICRP Publication 152 [1] as a memorandum, the models for leukaemia were not correctly described. The excess absolute risk (EAR) model model calculates the risk per 10 000 persons per year, and the explanation for the parameter {\ss} in table 3.4 was intended to indicate that point. However, the description {\textquoteleft}Excess cases per 10 000 persons per year per Gy for time since exposure centred at 25 years{\textquoteright} is not correct as {\ss} is a coefficient for the linear term of dose in the linear-quadratic model. The model for the baseline incidence also yields the number of cases per 10 000 persons per year, but there was no description about it. Corrections should be made as follows. Page 4, table 3. (Table Presented).",

author = "Nobuhiko Ban and Enora Cle{\'e}ro and Ludovic Vaillant and Wei Zhang and Nobuyuki Hamada and Dale Preston and Dominique Laurier",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

journal = "Journal of Radiological Protection",

issn = "0952-4746",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (J. Radiol. Prot. (2022) 42 (023001) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac670d)

AU - Ban, Nobuhiko

AU - Cleéro, Enora

AU - Vaillant, Ludovic

AU - Zhang, Wei

AU - Hamada, Nobuyuki

AU - Preston, Dale

AU - Laurier, Dominique

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - In our paper that provided a summary of ICRP Publication 152 [1] as a memorandum, the models for leukaemia were not correctly described. The excess absolute risk (EAR) model model calculates the risk per 10 000 persons per year, and the explanation for the parameter ß in table 3.4 was intended to indicate that point. However, the description ‘Excess cases per 10 000 persons per year per Gy for time since exposure centred at 25 years’ is not correct as ß is a coefficient for the linear term of dose in the linear-quadratic model. The model for the baseline incidence also yields the number of cases per 10 000 persons per year, but there was no description about it. Corrections should be made as follows. Page 4, table 3. (Table Presented).

AB - In our paper that provided a summary of ICRP Publication 152 [1] as a memorandum, the models for leukaemia were not correctly described. The excess absolute risk (EAR) model model calculates the risk per 10 000 persons per year, and the explanation for the parameter ß in table 3.4 was intended to indicate that point. However, the description ‘Excess cases per 10 000 persons per year per Gy for time since exposure centred at 25 years’ is not correct as ß is a coefficient for the linear term of dose in the linear-quadratic model. The model for the baseline incidence also yields the number of cases per 10 000 persons per year, but there was no description about it. Corrections should be made as follows. Page 4, table 3. (Table Presented).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136231244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f

DO - 10.1088/1361-6498/ac804f

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85136231244

SN - 0952-4746

VL - 42

JO - Journal of Radiological Protection

JF - Journal of Radiological Protection

IS - 3

M1 - 039501

ER -

Erratum: Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (J. Radiol. Prot. (2022) 42 (023001) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac670d)

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this