Abstract
Objectives: We reviewed environmental public health practice at a local level (roles, responsibilities, interaction with partner agencies) to establish what and how an integrated approach to the service, as found in Cheshire and Merseyside, North West England, should be delivered, if at all, and at what footprint. Study design: Mixed methods approach. Methods: We triangulated: qualitative interviews with relevant professionals to gain an in-depth understanding of their interest and vision for any health protection input to health risks and outcomes from environmental issues; an electronic questionnaire assessing experience, interest, vision and comfort zones of a wider range of professionals involved in environmental health issues; a half-day workshop to review study findings and agree ways forward. Results: Stakeholders value their local health protection team's input, but environmental public-health knowledge and skills also exist in local authority teams. Regional health protection teams can provide environmental public-health expertise to local partners and agencies. They harness national input and evidence with local frontline professionals practice, enabling locally grounded approaches, integrating science into local contexts, to answer difficult, often incorrigible, problems. Conclusions: Specialist leadership by experienced Consultants in Health Protection is of value to local authority public health and environmental teams and should be based on a footprint that is appropriate to enhance local relationships without compromising available expert knowledge and skills.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 150-159 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Public Health |
Volume | 221 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023
Keywords
- Collaboration
- Environment
- Health protection
- Partnership
- Risk assessment
- Risk management
- Wicked problems