Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of practised screening methods for detection of cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

  • Russell Hope*
  • , N. A.C. Potz
  • , Marina Warner
  • , E. J. Fagan
  • , E. Arnold
  • , D. M. Livermore
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are now widespread and simple phenotypic tests are required to detect them in diagnostic laboratories. We investigated the performance of screening methods at 16 hospitals in South-East England. Methods: Sixteen laboratories in South-East England submitted 1195 consecutive Enterobacteriaceae isolates found to be resistant, by their routine methods, to any or all of cefpodoxime, ceftazidime and cefotaxime. These isolates were re-tested centrally with various cephalosporin/clavulanate combinations and with multiplex PCR for blaCTX-M and bla AmpC alleles. Results: Screening methods among the laboratories were the following: cefpodoxime discs alone (1 site); cefpodoxime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime discs (9 sites) or agar dilution (1 site); Phoenix (2 sites), Vitek 1 (1 site) and Vitek 2 (2 sites). A total of 8% of isolates submitted based on disc tests proved fully cephalosporin-susceptible, compared with 3% sent based on tests with automated systems and none of those sent based on agar dilution tests. Among isolates submitted solely on cefpodoxime resistance 256/372 (69%) proved cephalosporin-susceptible or had only borderline resistance with no clear mechanism demonstrable; this proportion decreased to 28/160 (18%) for those submitted on the basis of resistance to ceftazidime, 18/122 (15%) for those resistant to cefotaxime and 26/496 (5%) for those resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftazidime. The inference of ESBL production by Vitek 2 had the best agreement with reference laboratory results. Conclusions: Many isolates found resistant only to cefpodoximeat the source sites proved not to have ESBLs or AmpC; screening with cefotaxime and ceftazidime allowed better specificity for identification of mechanism-based resistance, as did the automated systems. Cefpodoxime disc tests nevertheless remain a useful primary screen for laboratories prepared only to test one agent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-113
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Diagnostic tests
  • ESBL detection
  • β-lactamases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of practised screening methods for detection of cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this