Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 lockdown, referrals via the 2-week-wait urgent pathway for suspected cancer in England, UK, are reported to have decreased by up to 84%. We aimed to examine the impact of different scenarios of lockdown-accumulated backlog in cancer referrals on cancer survival, and the impact on survival per referred patient due to delayed referral versus risk of death from nosocomial infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Methods: In this modelling study, we used age-stratified and stage-stratified 10-year cancer survival estimates for patients in England, UK, for 20 common tumour types diagnosed in 2008–17 at age 30 years and older from Public Health England. We also used data for cancer diagnoses made via the 2-week-wait referral pathway in 2013–16 from the Cancer Waiting Times system from NHS Digital. We applied per-day hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer progression that we generated from observational studies of delay to treatment. We quantified the annual numbers of cancers at stage I–III diagnosed via the 2-week-wait pathway using 2-week-wait age-specific and stage-specific breakdowns. From these numbers, we estimated the aggregate number of lives and life-years lost in England for per-patient delays of 1–6 months in presentation, diagnosis, or cancer treatment, or a combination of these. We assessed three scenarios of a 3-month period of lockdown during which 25%, 50%, and 75% of the normal monthly volumes of symptomatic patients delayed their presentation until after lockdown. Using referral-to-diagnosis conversion rates and COVID-19 case-fatality rates, we also estimated the survival increment per patient referred.
Findings: Across England in 2013–16, an average of 6281 patients with stage I–III cancer were diagnosed via the 2-week-wait pathway per month, of whom 1691 (27%) would be predicted to die within 10 years from their disease. Delays in presentation via the 2-week-wait pathway over a 3-month lockdown period (with an average presentational delay of 2 months per patient) would result in 181 additional lives and 3316 life-years lost as a result of a backlog of referrals of 25%, 361 additional lives and 6632 life-years lost for a 50% backlog of referrals, and 542 additional lives and 9948 life-years lost for a 75% backlog in referrals. Compared with all diagnostics for the backlog being done in month 1 after lockdown, additional capacity across months 1–3 would result in 90 additional lives and 1662 live-years lost due to diagnostic delays for the 25% backlog scenario, 183 additional lives and 3362 life-years lost under the 50% backlog scenario, and 276 additional lives and 5075 life-years lost under the 75% backlog scenario. However, a delay in additional diagnostic capacity with provision spread across months 3–8 after lockdown would result in 401 additional lives and 7332 life-years lost due to diagnostic delays under the 25% backlog scenario, 811 additional lives and 14 873 life-years lost under the 50% backlog scenario, and 1231 additional lives and 22 635 life-years lost under the 75% backlog scenario. A 2-month delay in 2-week-wait investigatory referrals results in an estimated loss of between 0·0 and 0·7 life-years per referred patient, depending on age and tumour type.
Interpretation: Prompt provision of additional capacity to address the backlog of diagnostics will minimise deaths as a result of diagnostic delays that could add to those predicted due to expected presentational delays. Prioritisation of patient groups for whom delay would result in most life-years lost warrants consideration as an option for mitigating the aggregate burden of mortality in patients with cancer.
Funding: None.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1035-1044 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | The Lancet Oncology |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 20 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Aug 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: AS, CT, RH, and MEJ are supported by the Institute of Cancer Research. MEJ also received funding from Breast Cancer Now. BT and AG are supported by Cancer Research UK (C61296/A27223). CL and CT receive support from the Movember foundation. RH is supported by Cancer Research UK (C1298/A8362) and Bobby Moore Fund for Cancer. GL is supported by a Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist Fellowship Award (C18081/A18180) and is Associate Director of the multi-institutional CanTest Collaborative funded by Cancer Research UK (C8640/A23385). DCM is supported by Cancer Research UK (C57955/A24390). AS is in receipt of an Academic Clinical Lectureship from National Institute for Health Research and Biomedical Research Centre post-doctoral support. EM receives post-doctoral support from Health Data Research UK and Cancer Focus Northern Ireland grants. ML is funded by Health Data Research UK and UK Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund.ML reports personal fees and grants from Pfizer and personal fees from Roche outside of the submitted work. CS reports grants from Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim; grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Roche-Ventana; personal fees from Novartis, MSD, Illumina, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Medicxi, and Sarah Canon Research Institute; personal fees and stock options from GRAIL; stock options from EPIC Biosciences and Apogen Biotech; and personal fees and being a co-founder of Achilles Therapeutics during the conduct of the study. CS has patents issued for an immune checkpoint intervention in cancer (PCT/EP2016/071471), for a method for treating cancer based on identification of clonal neo-antigens (PCT/EP2016/059401), for methods for lung cancer detection (PCT/US2017/028013), for a method of detecting tumour recurrence (PCT/GB2017/053289), for a method for treating cancer (PCT/EP2016/059401), for a method of treating cancer by targeting insertion/deletion mutations (PCT/GB2018/051893), for a method of identifying insertion/deletion mutation targets (PCT/GB2018/051892), for a method for determining whether an HLA allele is lost in a tumour (PCT/GB2018/052004), for a method for identifying responders to cancer treatment (PCT/GB2018/051912), and for a method of predicting survival rates for cancer patients (PCT/GB2020/050221). JL reports grants and personal fees from Achilles Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Immunocore; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boston Biomedical, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Imugene, Incyte, iOnctura, Kymab, Merck Sorono, Pierre Fabre, Secarna, Vitaccess, and Covance; and grants from Aveo and Pharmacyclics outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access; Free to read, but no Open Access licence.
Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Citation: Amit Sud, Bethany Torr, Michael E Jones, John Broggio, Stephen Scott, Chey Loveday, Alice Garrett, Firza Gronthoud, David L Nicol, Shaman Jhanji, Stephen A Boyce, Matthew Williams, Elio Riboli, David C Muller, Emma Kipps, James Larkin, Neal Navani, Charles Swanton, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ethna McFerran, Mark Lawler, Richard Houlston, Clare Turnbull, Effect of delays in the 2-week-wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study, The Lancet Oncology, Volume 21, Issue 8,
2020, Pages 1035-1044, ISSN 1470-2045.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30392-2.