Abstract
Background: Suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) syndromes are a common reason for empirical antibiotics to be prescribed in the Emergency Department (ED), but differentiating UTI from other conditions with a similar presentation is challenging. We investigated how often an ED diagnosis of UTI is confirmed clinically/microbiologically, and described conditions which present as UTI syndromes. Methods: Observational study using electronic health records from patients who attended the ED with suspected UTI and had a urine sample submitted for culture. We compared the ED diagnosis to diagnosis at discharge from hospital (ICD-10 codes), and estimated the proportion of cases with clinical/microbiological evidence of UTI. Results: Two hundred eighty nine patients had an ED diagnosis of UTI syndrome comprising: lower UTI (191), pyelonephritis (56) and urosepsis (42). In patients admitted to hospital with an ED diagnosis of lower UTI, pyelonephritis or urosepsis, clinical/microbiological evidence of UTI was lacking in 61/103, 33/54 and 31/42 cases respectively. The ED diagnosis was concordant with the main reason for admission in less than 40% of patients with UTI syndromes, and antibiotics were stopped within 72 h in 37/161 patients. Conclusions: Clinical/microbiological evidence of UTI was lacking in 60-70% of patients, suggesting scope to revise empirical prescribing decisions for UTI syndromes in light of microbial culture and clinical progression.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 40 |
| Journal | BMC Emergency Medicine |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 May 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 The Author(s).
Keywords
- Antimicrobial resistance
- Antimicrobial stewardship
- Electronic health records
- Emergency department
- Urinary tract infection
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic uncertainty and urinary tract infection in the emergency department: A cohort study from a UK hospital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver