TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of the ISARIC 4C Deterioration model for adults hospitalised with COVID-19
T2 - a prospective cohort study
AU - ISARIC4C Investigators
AU - Gupta, Rishi K.
AU - Harrison, Ewen M.
AU - Ho, Antonia
AU - Docherty, Annemarie B.
AU - Knight, Stephen R.
AU - van Smeden, Maarten
AU - Abubakar, Ibrahim
AU - Lipman, Marc
AU - Quartagno, Matteo
AU - Pius, Riinu
AU - Buchan, Iain
AU - Carson, Gail
AU - Drake, Thomas M.
AU - Dunning, Jake
AU - Fairfield, Cameron J.
AU - Gamble, Carrol
AU - Green, Christopher A.
AU - Halpin, Sophie
AU - Hardwick, Hayley E.
AU - Holden, Karl A.
AU - Horby, Peter W.
AU - Jackson, Clare
AU - Mclean, Kenneth A.
AU - Merson, Laura
AU - Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
AU - Norman, Lisa
AU - Olliaro, Piero L.
AU - Pritchard, Mark G.
AU - Russell, Clark D.
AU - Scott-Brown, James
AU - Shaw, Catherine A.
AU - Sheikh, Aziz
AU - Solomon, Tom
AU - Sudlow, Cathie
AU - Swann, Olivia V.
AU - Turtle, Lance
AU - Openshaw, Peter J.M.
AU - Baillie, J. Kenneth
AU - Semple, Malcolm G.
AU - Noursadeghi, Mahdad
AU - Openshaw, Peter JM
AU - Alex, Beatrice
AU - Bach, Benjamin
AU - Barclay, Wendy S.
AU - Bogaert, Debby
AU - Chand, Meera
AU - Cooke, Graham S.
AU - Ijaz, Samreen
AU - Tedder, Richard S.
AU - Zambon, Maria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: Prognostic models to predict the risk of clinical deterioration in acute COVID-19 cases are urgently required to inform clinical management decisions. Methods: We developed and validated a multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital clinical deterioration (defined as any requirement of ventilatory support or critical care, or death) among consecutively hospitalised adults with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 who were prospectively recruited to the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC4C) study across 260 hospitals in England, Scotland, and Wales. Candidate predictors that were specified a priori were considered for inclusion in the model on the basis of previous prognostic scores and emerging literature describing routinely measured biomarkers associated with COVID-19 prognosis. We used internal–external cross-validation to evaluate discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility across eight National Health Service (NHS) regions in the development cohort. We further validated the final model in held-out data from an additional NHS region (London). Findings: 74 944 participants (recruited between Feb 6 and Aug 26, 2020) were included, of whom 31 924 (43·2%) of 73 948 with available outcomes met the composite clinical deterioration outcome. In internal–external cross-validation in the development cohort of 66 705 participants, the selected model (comprising 11 predictors routinely measured at the point of hospital admission) showed consistent discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility across all eight NHS regions. In held-out data from London (n=8239), the model showed a similarly consistent performance (C-statistic 0·77 [95% CI 0·76 to 0·78]; calibration-in-the-large 0·00 [–0·05 to 0·05]); calibration slope 0·96 [0·91 to 1·01]), and greater net benefit than any other reproducible prognostic model. Interpretation: The 4C Deterioration model has strong potential for clinical utility and generalisability to predict clinical deterioration and inform decision making among adults hospitalised with COVID-19. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Department for International Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, EU Platform for European Preparedness Against (Re-)emerging Epidemics, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool, NIHR HPRU in Respiratory Infections at Imperial College London.
AB - Background: Prognostic models to predict the risk of clinical deterioration in acute COVID-19 cases are urgently required to inform clinical management decisions. Methods: We developed and validated a multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital clinical deterioration (defined as any requirement of ventilatory support or critical care, or death) among consecutively hospitalised adults with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 who were prospectively recruited to the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC4C) study across 260 hospitals in England, Scotland, and Wales. Candidate predictors that were specified a priori were considered for inclusion in the model on the basis of previous prognostic scores and emerging literature describing routinely measured biomarkers associated with COVID-19 prognosis. We used internal–external cross-validation to evaluate discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility across eight National Health Service (NHS) regions in the development cohort. We further validated the final model in held-out data from an additional NHS region (London). Findings: 74 944 participants (recruited between Feb 6 and Aug 26, 2020) were included, of whom 31 924 (43·2%) of 73 948 with available outcomes met the composite clinical deterioration outcome. In internal–external cross-validation in the development cohort of 66 705 participants, the selected model (comprising 11 predictors routinely measured at the point of hospital admission) showed consistent discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility across all eight NHS regions. In held-out data from London (n=8239), the model showed a similarly consistent performance (C-statistic 0·77 [95% CI 0·76 to 0·78]; calibration-in-the-large 0·00 [–0·05 to 0·05]); calibration slope 0·96 [0·91 to 1·01]), and greater net benefit than any other reproducible prognostic model. Interpretation: The 4C Deterioration model has strong potential for clinical utility and generalisability to predict clinical deterioration and inform decision making among adults hospitalised with COVID-19. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Department for International Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, EU Platform for European Preparedness Against (Re-)emerging Epidemics, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool, NIHR HPRU in Respiratory Infections at Imperial College London.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099982800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30559-2
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30559-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33444539
AN - SCOPUS:85099982800
SN - 2213-2600
VL - 9
SP - 349
EP - 359
JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
IS - 4
ER -