Cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test for diagnosing patients with suspected bloodstream infection in Ireland

Mathilde Vankelegom, David Burke, Amr Mohammed Farghaly Mohammed, Natalie L. McEvoy, Gerard F. Curley, Katy Turner, Amy Pinsent, Elisabeth J. Adams*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A rapid point-of-care (PoC) test as an adjunct to blood culture to aid the diagnosis of sepsis patients with bloodstream infections may decrease the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and reduce rates of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy (IAAT) use. Through a decision tree model, taking the perspective of the Irish healthcare provider, the cost-effectiveness of such an intervention was evaluated against the current standard of care (SoC) in hospitalized adults in Ireland. The base-case scenario showed that using a rapid PoC test was cost-saving and life-saving, with €8188 saved per death averted. The results were sensitive to the length of hospital stay for patients with true-positive and true-negative results and to the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit. The threshold analysis showed that even at lower sensitivities, the rapid PoC test could be cost-effective due to the substantial impact of starting earlier targeted and appropriate treatment in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and sepsis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101056
JournalInformatics in Medicine Unlocked
Volume32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Keywords

  • Bloodstream infection
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Point-of-care diagnosis
  • Rapid diagnostics
  • Sepsis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test for diagnosing patients with suspected bloodstream infection in Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this