Complicated epilepsy surgery: importance of balancing benefit and deficit

John S. Duncan*, Virginia Beech, Fahmida Amin Chowdhury, Anna Miserocchi, Andrew McEvoy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The risk-benefit ratio of epilepsy surgery needs careful consideration, is different for each individual and requires a careful, informed dialogue between the person concerned and their medical advisers. We illustrate this process with Virginia, who has had refractory focal epilepsy from age 1 year and a left hemiparesis. At the age of 45 years, we discussed the possibility of epilepsy surgery and went through non-invasive investigations with structural and functional MRI, tractography, scalp video-EEG telemetry, neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric evaluations. This was followed by a decision to carry out intracranial EEG to define the area of seizure onset and its relation to an area of focal cortical dysplasia, eloquent cortex and tracts. We agreed to carry out a focal resection in the knowledge that this would result in a loss of left-hand function. One year later, Virginia is seizure-free on reduced medication. We describe the steps in the process with Virginia's views.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpn-2023-003901
JournalPractical Neurology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • EPILEPSY
  • HEMIPLEGIA
  • SURGERY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complicated epilepsy surgery: importance of balancing benefit and deficit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this