Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of a frozen human foreskin fibroblast cell assay to an enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile

  • Alastair J. Strachan*
  • , Natalie E. Evans
  • , O. Martin Williams
  • , Robert C. Spencer
  • , Rosemary Greenwood
  • , Chris J. Probert
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study set out to validate the Hs27 ReadyCell assay (RCCNA) as an alternative CCNA method compared against a commonly used commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method and toxigenic culture (TC) reference standard. A total of 860 samples were identified from those submitted to the Health Protection Agency microbiology laboratories over a 30-week period. RCCNA performed much better than EIA when using TC as a gold standard, with sensitivities of 90.8% versus 78.6% and positive predictive value of 87.3% to 81.9%, respectively. The Hs27 Human Foreskin Fibroblast ReadyCells are an easy-to-use and a sensitive CCNA method for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from stool. A turnaround time of up to 48 h for a negative result and possible need for repeat testing make it an unsuitable method to be used in most clinical laboratory setting.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-45
    Number of pages4
    JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Volume75
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Clostridium difficile
    • Cytotoxin
    • Enzyme immunoassay
    • Toxigenic culture

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of a frozen human foreskin fibroblast cell assay to an enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this