Abstract
Purpose: To compare specific absorption parameter values obtained from in vitro dissolution studies (this paper) and in vivo experiments (data published by Ramounet et al, 2000) and to determine their influence on Dose Per Unit Intake (DPUI) calculations. Materials and methods: Experiments were performed on plutonium oxide (PuO2) and two Mixed Oxide (MOx) preparations containing 5% Pu (w/w) made according to the industrial process in vitro using a static test and in vivo after rat inhalation. Results: Behaviour of Pu and Am shows, in vitro, at shorter times, a greater rapid dissolution fraction f r for Pu (factor 10) and Am (factor 2) with MOx powders compared with PuO2, whereas in vivo results show a greater fraction fr for Pu (factor 5) and Am (factor 15) with PuO2 compared with MOx powders. This phenomenon has not been observed for slow dissolution absorption parameter ss. The in vivo parameters for Pu and Am in these materials were very close to the default values recommended by International Commission for Radiological Protection for default Type S. Conclusions: Results obtained have shown that solubility of Pu from the mixed oxide was higher than that of Pu from PuO2. Nevertheless, no significant difference was observed between the three compounds in the corresponding dose coefficients in vivo or in vitro. Therefore, for these particular compounds, variation in the chemical composition of the aerosols had no significant influence on DPUI. Consequently, in vitro, the dissolution test can provide a good estimate of the in vivo behaviour. Studies of variation of % Pu (w/w) from MOx are in progress in our laboratory to confirm these conclusions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 777-785 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | International Journal of Radiation Biology |
Volume | 80 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2004 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors wish to thank Mrs M. C. Abram, Mr G. Rateau and Mr G. Grillon for their participation in radiochemical analysis and for inhalation experiments. This work was partly funded by COGEMA (Progamme d’Intérêt Commun, D10 CEA/COGEMA).
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.