Communicating Geographical Risks in Crisis Management: The Need for Research

Simon French*, Nikolaos Argyris, Stephanie M. Haywood, Matthew C. Hort, Jim Q. Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In any crisis, there is a great deal of uncertainty, often geographical uncertainty or, more precisely, spatiotemporal uncertainty. Examples include the spread of contamination from an industrial accident, drifting volcanic ash, and the path of a hurricane. Estimating spatiotemporal probabilities is usually a difficult task, but that is not our primary concern. Rather, we ask how analysts can communicate spatiotemporal uncertainty to those handling the crisis. We comment on the somewhat limited literature on the representation of spatial uncertainty on maps. We note that many cognitive issues arise and that the potential for confusion is high. We note that in the early stages of handling a crisis, the uncertainties involved may be deep, i.e., difficult or impossible to quantify in the time available. In such circumstance, we suggest the idea of presenting multiple scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-16
Number of pages8
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Society for Risk Analysis

Keywords

  • Crisis response
  • geographical risk
  • risk communication
  • scenario-focused thinking
  • spatiotemporal uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communicating Geographical Risks in Crisis Management: The Need for Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this